|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Feb 27, 2015 9:45:21 GMT -6
Deep bench of alt-tards?
|
|
|
Post by Stan's Field on Feb 27, 2015 9:48:22 GMT -6
I wonder what it's like...
|
|
|
Post by egadsto on Feb 27, 2015 9:50:25 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by egadsto on Feb 27, 2015 10:40:28 GMT -6
How's that Obamacare thing working out for ya? In my case my premiums have doubled since Obamasuck was passed, deductibles have been raised about four times what they were, around here people are finding it harder to find doctors who'll take the cheap-ass policies they bought through the "exchange." Yeah, it has worked out real well. As far as the world ending because the Kenyan Socialist was elected twice, that remains to be seen... every word of this retarded post is 100% false. try telling the truth for a change, shitbag. Sack up for once in your miserable life.
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Feb 27, 2015 10:53:20 GMT -6
If this 332-page plan is so fucking great, why couldn't the FCC release it publicly for a 30-day review before acting on it? Why does it refuse to release it now? What are they hiding? Sheeple will get what they deserve. It's actually liek 9 pages with a shitload of citations etc. You're wading into Alex Jones territory, my friend. Your mind is being poisoned. Why don't you give my methodology a shot for a while and see how things work out. It's simple, but it requires discipline. Here it is: If a thing is proven via empirical evidence to be true, I believe it and I incorporate it. Opposing theories/statements must prove the thing untrue before I grant them credence. If truth is not completely ascertainable, the rationality test is applied: Is this a rational idea/theory? If one idea/theory is clearly more rational than a competing idea/theory, then the former is adopted barring further evidence of the superiority of the competing idea/theory. If competing theories cannot be distinguished via the truth or rationality tests, then judgment is suspended pending further evidence. It's all very Vulcan to be sure, but it affords one intellectual and moral clarity. Beats the shit outta being hoodwinked by propagandists and ideologues.
|
|
|
Post by BrainFerentz4Prez on Feb 27, 2015 11:00:23 GMT -6
It woodnt matter bruh. garbage in garbage out.
|
|
|
Post by Incogayno. on Feb 27, 2015 12:50:55 GMT -6
So, Tweederp gets called out and shuts the fuck up finally? God damnit. Why didnt someone drop these knows earlier?
|
|
|
Post by Incogayno. on Mar 2, 2015 12:11:03 GMT -6
Once again. Tweets posts an opinion piece as fact.
|
|
|
Post by Incogayno. on Mar 2, 2015 12:13:10 GMT -6
Yeah. Its an opinion piece. Do you know what those are?
|
|
|
Post by Incogayno. on Mar 2, 2015 12:14:52 GMT -6
Anything posted to the opinion section of any site or paper is just as reliable as fox news. Stick to facts. Don't let others speak for you.
|
|
|
Post by Incogayno. on Mar 2, 2015 12:18:42 GMT -6
This is loded with what ifs and what could had beens with no basis in fact. The guy says more than once that he has no idea what is in it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2015 13:00:41 GMT -6
This is loded with what ifs and what could had beens with no basis in fact. The guy says more than once that he has no idea what is in it. Scoots, bince you read the FCC rules can you let us all know what's in it? I'll hang up and listen.
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Mar 2, 2015 13:04:48 GMT -6
Tweets, you don't have to lie to sound like a tard. Oh, fuck. Even the big money interwebz libtards are just waking up to the fact that the White House hood-winked 'em on the euphemistically named "Net Neutrality." Keep poking that chicken, tho, dumbfucks. Liberals Mugged by ObamanetWhen Google’s Eric Schmidt called White House officials a few weeks ago to oppose President Obama ’s demand that the Internet be regulated as a utility, they told him to buzz off. The chairman of the company that led lobbying for “net neutrality” learned the Obama plan made in its name instead micromanages the Internet.
Mr. Schmidt is not the only liberal mugged by the reality of Obamanet, approved on party lines last week by the Federal Communications Commission. The 300-plus pages of regulations remain secret, but as details leak out, liberals have joined the opposition to ending the Internet as we know it.
The Progressive Policy Institute said: “There is nothing progressive about the FCC backsliding to common carrier rules dating back to the 1930s.” The Internet Society, a net-neutrality advocate, said: “We are concerned with the FCC’s decision to base new rules for the modern Internet on decades-old telephone regulations designed for a very different technological era.” Former Clinton official Larry Irving wrote in the Hill: “Most of today’s proponents of a utility model for the Internet either have forgotten or never knew the genesis of the ‘regulatory restraint’ model that helped spur and continues to support Internet expansion.”
Verizon poked fun at the FCC’s retrograde move by issuing a news release in Morse code and in an old-fashioned typewriter font, dated “February 26, 1934,” the year Congress passed the Communications Act to regulate the telephone monopoly—the law the FCC is now applying to the Internet.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which supports applying the 1934 law to the Internet, nonetheless objects to a new regulation giving the FCC open-ended power to regulate the Internet. “A ‘general conduct rule,’ applied on a case-by-case basis,” the EFF wrote, “may lead to years of expensive litigation to determine the meaning of ‘harm’ (for those who can afford to engage in it).”
The general-conduct rule reportedly has seven standards, one of which is the “effect on free expression.” Net neutrality was supposed to ban online discrimination based on content. Instead, it is empowering the FCC—the agency that for decades enforced the “Fairness Doctrine” and that last year proposed studying “bias” in newsrooms—to chill speech.
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler justified Obamanet by saying the Internet is “simply too important to be left without rules and without a referee.” He got it backward: Light-handed regulation made today’s Internet possible.
What if at the beginning of the Web, Washington had opted for Obamanet instead of the open Internet? Yellow Pages publishers could have invoked “harm” and “unjust and unreasonable” competition from online telephone directories. This could have strangled Alta Vista and Excite, the early leaders in search, and relegated Google to a Stanford student project. Newspapers could have lobbied against Craigslist for depriving them of classified advertising. Encyclopedia Britannica could have lobbied against Wikipedia.
Competitors could have objected to the “fast lane” that Amazon got from Sprint at the launch of the Kindle to ensure speedy e-book downloads. The FCC could have blocked Apple from integrating Internet access into the iPhone. Activists could have objected to AOL bundling access to The Wall Street Journal in its early dial-up service.
Among the first targets of the FCC’s “unjust and unreasonable” test are mobile-phone contracts that offer unlimited video or music. Netflix , the biggest lobbyist for utility regulation, could be regulated for how it uses encryption to deliver its content.
Until Congress or the courts block Obamanet, expect less innovation. During a TechFreedom conference last week, dissenting FCC commissioner Ajit Pai asked: “If you were an entrepreneur trying to make a splash in a marketplace that’s already competitive, how are you going to differentiate yourself if you have to build into your equation whether or not regulatory permission is going to be forthcoming from the FCC? According to this, permissionless innovation is a thing of the past.”
The other dissenting Republican commissioner, Michael O’Rielly, warned: “When you see this document, it’s worse than you imagine.” The FCC has no estimate on when it will make the rules public.
The silver lining is a valuable lesson for Silicon Valley executives who thought it was safe to lobby for net neutrality, but instead got Obamanet: The only place on the Internet for Washington regulators is at arm’s length.If you're not using the WSJ to pick up dogshit, you're just using it wrong. You pollute your mind with this stupid fucking shit, and then you come here and tell us about it. What, pray tell, is your endgame? To be thought of as a koolaid-chugging, self-propagandazing dumbass? Safe to say, coming from the crowd that is wrong about, well, EVERYTHING, you can bet your ass that none of these doomsday predictions will ever come to pass.
|
|
|
Post by Incogayno. on Mar 2, 2015 13:37:18 GMT -6
do I even have to post PWN3d again in any of these threads after marki shittlebreath posts a dispatch from teh cocoon? Or is it understood by everyone that he walked himself into the propeller again, every time? Yes.
|
|
|
Post by BrainFerentz4Prez on Mar 2, 2015 14:08:44 GMT -6
Why does that wonderful journalistic article not have a single quote from the head of Google or any other of these liberals that fink a neutral net is bad? Hows come?
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Mar 2, 2015 14:24:19 GMT -6
Why does that wonderful journalistic article not have a single quote from the head of Google or any other of these liberals that fink a neutral net is bad? Hows come? It's actually an op-ed, not a journalistic article. WSJ does a helluva job just reporting the news and not using its main paper as an op-ed, like the NYT does.
|
|
|
Post by BrainFerentz4Prez on Mar 2, 2015 14:41:33 GMT -6
Why does that wonderful journalistic article not have a single quote from the head of Google or any other of these liberals that fink a neutral net is bad? Hows come? It's actually an op-ed, not a journalistic article. WSJ does a helluva job just reporting the news and not using its main paper as an op-ed, like the NYT does. OIC. So its this guys opinion that someone he didnt talk to finks net nutrality bites. In that case its my opinion you fink Aaron White is the best player in big 10 history.
|
|
|
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Mar 2, 2015 23:01:57 GMT -6
Funny, Google is fully behind this ruling by the FCC. Care to find an actual quote from him?
|
|
|
Post by socal on Mar 3, 2015 8:27:29 GMT -6
This whole, you guys will regret this shtick that tweets and the rest of the repubs have been peddling sounds familiar. Where have I heard this before? Oh yes. The world was supposed to end both the first and second time Obama was elected. Oh we also heard it about obamacare. How's that Obamacare thing working out for ya? In my case my premiums have doubled since Obamasuck was passed, deductibles have been raised about four times what they were, around here people are finding it harder to find doctors who'll take the cheap-ass policies they bought through the "exchange." Yeah, it has worked out real well. As far as the world ending because the Kenyan Socialist was elected twice, that remains to be seen... Post some actual facts & figures. Otherwise you're full of aneccdotal shit again. Premiums before (Along with job & insurance plans offered) Premiums now (Along with job & insurance plans offered) For example, even though my premiums went up approx 3% last year for the same plan my work offers, it still is much less than the trend of 10-25% / year they were increasing before the ACA. Secondly, I could have easily tripled my premiums or halved them by changing my plan options. My 3% increase was an apples for apples change. Again, post some info - or STFU.
|
|
|
Post by The Resistance on Mar 3, 2015 9:45:13 GMT -6
In the words of a immortal from NC. Bestest plan eva. Flawless. Fully funded. Rock on.
|
|
|
Post by The Resistance on Mar 3, 2015 9:46:08 GMT -6
BTW Chuck did you see the NASDAQ close yesterday.
We're back.
|
|
|
Post by The Resistance on Mar 3, 2015 9:49:34 GMT -6
In the words of a immortal from NC. Bestest plan eva. Flawless. Fully funded. Rock on. Ur hangover is impairing ur judgement and memory. Too busy. Haven't had a drop for a week. That may change tonight.
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Mar 3, 2015 10:10:00 GMT -6
BTW Chuck did you see the NASDAQ close yesterday. We're back. In 2000 I sold rather substantial holding of tech stocks at NASDAQ 4700. Left for Europe on the day NASDAQ hit its all time high, got back two weeks later, saw what was coming (y'all remember fuckedcompany.com?) and said thank you very much, pigs get slaughtered, I'll take my profits and call it a day. And when I say sold, I mean I sold every one of those motherfuckers. All at once. It felt kind of deviant. I've made a lot of bad choices in my time, but that wasn't one of them.
|
|
|
Post by The Resistance on Mar 3, 2015 10:11:29 GMT -6
I was searching for Preparation H.
|
|
|
Post by A boy named Sioux on Mar 3, 2015 14:50:49 GMT -6
I have to say, since this neutrality thing passed the internet speed at the house has gone to shit. They must be sharing my baller bandwidth with a bunch of proles already. Thanks obama.
|
|