|
Post by The Resistance on Apr 4, 2014 9:38:10 GMT -6
Delicious.
|
|
|
Post by #70 on Apr 4, 2014 9:45:22 GMT -6
Paulina Gretzky
|
|
|
Post by The Resistance on Apr 4, 2014 9:51:32 GMT -6
Dustin Johnson is a lucky son of a gun.
|
|
|
Post by NotMyKid on Apr 4, 2014 9:57:41 GMT -6
Paulina is a butterface, just like her mom. Ridiculous body, meh face. WOOD, obviously. But Holly Sonders is MUCH better looking. I think her mom is better looking. And I can only imagine what Dustin Johnson and her talk about as they both seem to struggle with the English language.
|
|
|
Post by NotMyKid on Apr 4, 2014 10:12:43 GMT -6
Also not so shocking members of the LPGA are PISSED about the cover- Stacy Lewis has two majors to her credit and was No. 1 in the world for a bit last year, but has yet to appear on the cover- “It’s frustrating for female golfers. It’s kind of the state of where we’ve always been. We don’t get respect for being the golfers that we are. Obviously, Golf Digest is trying to sell magazines. But at the same time you’d like to see a little respect for the women’s game.”Juli Inkster, World Golf Hall of Famer, said: “It’s frustrating because it’s Golf Digest; it’s not Sports Illustrated’s swimsuit issue,” Inkster said, adding: “I think they should maybe recognize some of the great women golfers that we have. It’s like, What do you have to do to get a little respect? I’m guaranteeing you right now, it was not a woman editor who chose that cover.”sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/paulina-gretzky-golf-digest-cover-has-upset-the-lpga-144429353.html
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Apr 4, 2014 10:28:48 GMT -6
sheesh. shut up and go be ugly somewhere else, dikes No shit. If they had just gotten some oversized fake boobs, the guys would take their game more seriously.
|
|
|
Post by Incogayno. on Apr 4, 2014 10:33:08 GMT -6
What about this golfer?
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Apr 4, 2014 10:41:41 GMT -6
No shit. If they had just gotten some oversized fake boobs, the guys would take their game more seriously. riiiiight, because it's all about that juli inkster looks like billy bob thornton, and stacy lewis looks like mayor rob ford, but it's all about the boobs durrrrrr Like you don't look at their boobs first.....
|
|
|
Post by NotMyKid on Apr 4, 2014 10:44:00 GMT -6
No shit. If they had just gotten some oversized fake boobs, the guys would take their game more seriously. riiiiight, because it's all about that juli inkster looks like billy bob thornton, and stacy lewis looks like mayor rob ford, but it's all about the boobs durrrrrr The thing that a lot of women don't understand is it isn't all about sex appeal but when it comes to sports there are very few people that actually want to watch their sport based solely on their athletic ability. That goes for golf, basketball, soccer, etc. That isn't an opinion that is a fact. You can't be pissed at a magazine for trying to sell magazines (especially in this day and age) you either understand the game or you don't. And sorry but why would someone care that is making a decent living playing golf whether or not they can get on the cover of a magazine?
|
|
|
Post by NotMyKid on Apr 4, 2014 10:44:29 GMT -6
No shit. If they had just gotten some oversized fake boobs, the guys would take their game more seriously. riiiiight, because it's all about that juli inkster looks like billy bob thornton, and stacy lewis looks like mayor rob ford, but it's all about the boobs durrrrrr Also big time butter face.
|
|
|
Post by The Resistance on Apr 4, 2014 11:02:37 GMT -6
The top players on the LPGA are predominately foreign, and most are extremely ugly to boot. I'm sure this pig on the cover would help sell the heck out of magazines.
|
|
|
Post by TaterWanger on Apr 4, 2014 11:04:38 GMT -6
Wood not ^^^^^€ Please follow rules, all responses must include wood or wood not followed by new option.... K thanx
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Apr 4, 2014 11:36:47 GMT -6
riiiiight, because it's all about that juli inkster looks like billy bob thornton, and stacy lewis looks like mayor rob ford, but it's all about the boobs durrrrrr The thing that a lot of women don't understand is it isn't all about sex appeal but when it comes to sports there are very few people that actually want to watch their sport based solely on their athletic ability. That goes for golf, basketball, soccer, etc. That isn't an opinion that is a fact. You can't be pissed at a magazine for trying to sell magazines (especially in this day and age) you either understand the game or you don't. And sorry but why would someone care that is making a decent living playing golf whether or not they can get on the cover of a magazine? First off..I'm not pissed about anything. I think you're wrong...most women in athletics do understand that there aren't a lot of people watching their "sport". Why is that? I'll admit that I don't go out of my way to watch women's sports. The two quotes by the golfers above show they recognize that and I am sure it saddens them that they work hard and do well but don't get any recognition because they are "butter faces" or "dykes". The gal that made the cover may be a good golfer, I don't know, but the only reason she was put on the cover was because of her sex appeal. Women are still judged first on their appearance, no matter what their role is in our society, and that is both by men and women. It doesn't seem to work that way with men. There's a lot of fugly male athletes that make covers as a true representative of their athletic ability in their sport. Some things never change. Different times, Hoffa, I've picked up some subtle hostility by you about women. Hostility is really too strong a word, but you definitely are quick to jump on the "ugly" girl calling out the pretty girl thing. Maybe you're married to a pretty girl that gets picked on by the not so pretty gals? I can't remember, do you have any daughters? Twins right? I can't remember the gender. For the record, I hate golf. EDIT: Sorry for hijacking the thread.
|
|
|
Post by TaterWanger on Apr 4, 2014 11:42:30 GMT -6
Goddamn it then un hijack it, wood you hit tila tequila and post another pick,mof anyone.
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Apr 4, 2014 12:01:22 GMT -6
Wood not ^^^^^€ Please follow rules, all responses must include wood or wood not followed by new option.... K thanx Hell no... Oh yeah...I offer to you...
|
|
|
Post by TaterWanger on Apr 4, 2014 12:11:40 GMT -6
Wood not ^^^^^€ Please follow rules, all responses must include wood or wood not followed by new option.... K thanx Hell no... Oh yeah... GODDAMNIT WOMAN U AINT SPOSED TO ANSWER YOUR OWN PICTURE THATS FOR THE NEXT FUCKING PERSON HOW FUCKING HARD ID THIS FOR FUCKS SAKE HOWARE YOU A FUCKING MOD MOTHER FUCKIT ALL!!,
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Apr 4, 2014 12:12:58 GMT -6
For fucks sake...can someone post the rules in the thread title?
I fixed it
|
|
|
Post by NotMyKid on Apr 4, 2014 13:33:13 GMT -6
The thing that a lot of women don't understand is it isn't all about sex appeal but when it comes to sports there are very few people that actually want to watch their sport based solely on their athletic ability. That goes for golf, basketball, soccer, etc. That isn't an opinion that is a fact. You can't be pissed at a magazine for trying to sell magazines (especially in this day and age) you either understand the game or you don't. And sorry but why would someone care that is making a decent living playing golf whether or not they can get on the cover of a magazine? First off..I'm not pissed about anything. I think you're wrong...most women in athletics do understand that there aren't a lot of people watching their "sport". Why is that? I'll admit that I don't go out of my way to watch women's sports. The two quotes by the golfers above show they recognize that and I am sure it saddens them that they work hard and do well but don't get any recognition because they are "butter faces" or "dykes". The gal that made the cover may be a good golfer, I don't know, but the only reason she was put on the cover was because of her sex appeal. Women are still judged first on their appearance, no matter what their role is in our society, and that is both by men and women. It doesn't seem to work that way with men. There's a lot of fugly male athletes that make covers as a true representative of their athletic ability in their sport. Some things never change. Different times, Hoffa, I've picked up some subtle hostility by you about women. Hostility is really too strong a word, but you definitely are quick to jump on the "ugly" girl calling out the pretty girl thing. Maybe you're married to a pretty girl that gets picked on by the not so pretty gals? I can't remember, do you have any daughters? Twins right? I can't remember the gender. For the record, I hate golf. EDIT: Sorry for hijacking the thread. Holy shit I don't even know where to start with this but here goes, funny enough in a thread title asking if you would have sex with someone (no, not shallow at all) First and foremost my post was in response to the LPGA members being pissed about the cover. You know the same LPGA that told the female golfers to sex it up a bit or something along those lines to get better TV ratings, sponsorship's, etc. not you at all. The reason why most people don't watch female sports is they don't find it as entertaining as men. Not all but most. Again it's a magazine trying to sell magazines, no different than Vogue putting Kanye and Kim on their cover, or People or any other magazine for that matter putting topics and or people that will sell more magazines. Putting a female golfer on the cover isn't going to sell a lot of magazines at the news stand. That isn't because people are sexist most just don't watch golf. And everybody knows that sex sells that isn't a new concept but people continue to be amazed when a magazine, ad company, modeling agency, tv show, movie, etc. cast good looking people for parts. IT'S WHAT PEOPLE WANT. Not good looking people but EVERYONE!!!!! Again this wasn't intended to be directed at you it was silly comments from golfers that understand why she was put on the cover but complained about it (by the way the girl on the cover isn't a golfer but the daughter of Wayne Gretzky who happens to be engaged to PGA golfer Dustin Johnson) Also the reason why ugly male athletes get put on magazine covers is people are interested in their athletic ability, a magazine cover with Serena Williams on it is going to sell a hell of a lot more magazines than some golfer from the LPGA based on the fact that people know who the hell Serena Williams is and have an interest in her athletic ability more so than a golfer that they have never heard of. Finally, you of all people should understand what gets posted on message boards (especially this one for the love of god) isn't real life it's a place to say shit that you wouldn't say in public many times with a little to a large dose of smart assness. So whatever "hostility" or whatever you want to call it that you are picking up on from me couldn't be further from how I am in real life, sadly you have met me and would hope you wouldn't see me as a shallow person, but who knows. I have worked for several women (some good looking, some not and didn't and don't have a problem with women whether they are drop dead gorgeous or not at all. I understand that isn't what defines them and is nothing more than appearance. Anyway I still love you (and I hope you still love my hair) And not to totally fuck this thread up here is my contribution-
|
|
|
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Apr 4, 2014 13:55:29 GMT -6
And to Kim Jong Un up above, I'd hit it.
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Apr 4, 2014 15:27:53 GMT -6
First off..I'm not pissed about anything. I think you're wrong...most women in athletics do understand that there aren't a lot of people watching their "sport". Why is that? I'll admit that I don't go out of my way to watch women's sports. The two quotes by the golfers above show they recognize that and I am sure it saddens them that they work hard and do well but don't get any recognition because they are "butter faces" or "dykes". The gal that made the cover may be a good golfer, I don't know, but the only reason she was put on the cover was because of her sex appeal. Women are still judged first on their appearance, no matter what their role is in our society, and that is both by men and women. It doesn't seem to work that way with men. There's a lot of fugly male athletes that make covers as a true representative of their athletic ability in their sport. Some things never change. Different times, Hoffa, I've picked up some subtle hostility by you about women. Hostility is really too strong a word, but you definitely are quick to jump on the "ugly" girl calling out the pretty girl thing. Maybe you're married to a pretty girl that gets picked on by the not so pretty gals? I can't remember, do you have any daughters? Twins right? I can't remember the gender. For the record, I hate golf. EDIT: Sorry for hijacking the thread. Holy shit I don't even know where to start with this but here goes, funny enough in a thread title asking if you would have sex with someone (no, not shallow at all) First and foremost my post was in response to the LPGA members being pissed about the cover. You know the same LPGA that told the female golfers to sex it up a bit or something along those lines to get better TV ratings, sponsorship's, etc. not you at all. The reason why most people don't watch female sports is they don't find it as entertaining as men. Not all but most. Again it's a magazine trying to sell magazines, no different than Vogue putting Kanye and Kim on their cover, or People or any other magazine for that matter putting topics and or people that will sell more magazines. Putting a female golfer on the cover isn't going to sell a lot of magazines at the news stand. That isn't because people are sexist most just don't watch golf. And everybody knows that sex sells that isn't a new concept but people continue to be amazed when a magazine, ad company, modeling agency, tv show, movie, etc. cast good looking people for parts. IT'S WHAT PEOPLE WANT. Not good looking people but EVERYONE!!!!! Again this wasn't intended to be directed at you it was silly comments from golfers that understand why she was put on the cover but complained about it (by the way the girl on the cover isn't a golfer but the daughter of Wayne Gretzky who happens to be engaged to PGA golfer Dustin Johnson) Also the reason why ugly male athletes get put on magazine covers is people are interested in their athletic ability, a magazine cover with Serena Williams on it is going to sell a hell of a lot more magazines than some golfer from the LPGA based on the fact that people know who the hell Serena Williams is and have an interest in her athletic ability more so than a golfer that they have never heard of. Finally, you of all people should understand what gets posted on message boards (especially this one for the love of god) isn't real life it's a place to say shit that you wouldn't say in public many times with a little to a large dose of smart assness. So whatever "hostility" or whatever you want to call it that you are picking up on from me couldn't be further from how I am in real life, sadly you have met me and would hope you wouldn't see me as a shallow person, but who knows. I have worked for several women (some good looking, some not and didn't and don't have a problem with women whether they are drop dead gorgeous or not at all. I understand that isn't what defines them and is nothing more than appearance. Anyway I still love you (and I hope you still love my hair) And not to totally fuck this thread up here is my contribution- No...
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Apr 4, 2014 15:28:18 GMT -6
I love you and your hair Hoffa.
|
|
|
Post by NotMyKid on Apr 7, 2014 22:43:59 GMT -6
For señorita troller-
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Apr 7, 2014 22:47:59 GMT -6
For señorita troller- Like... are these pro golfers? Or...just guys that maybe golf? I don't like golf so unless your someone like Tiger Woods and have been involved with some scandal, I wouldn't necessarily know who is good or bad... or Ugly and fat.
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Apr 7, 2014 22:48:51 GMT -6
I REALLY like my redheaded troll lady.
|
|
|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Apr 11, 2014 16:03:28 GMT -6
Wood not, WOOD, wood. Wood? Wood I? Wat? Ummmm....
|
|