|
|
Post by The Bluzmn on Mar 25, 2008 8:47:49 GMT -6
I make no secret about being a Democrat, but this witch is making it awfully hard for me to consider voting for her if she overtakes Barrack for the nomination (Oh God, please no). Her latest is a description of her and her daughter landing in Bosnia under sniper fire and running with their heads down.
Are you kidding me? Anybody who allowed the first lady and her daughter to even land in that situation would have their head on the chopping block faster than hell.
So now the video of the landing comes out and, of course, nothing of the sort happened. She claims she "misspoke." Really? Misspoke? Somehow accidentally described a normal landing and minor ceremony as running with your head down while under sniper fire?
This bitch needs to shut up and go away.
|
|
|
|
Post by socal on Mar 25, 2008 8:52:02 GMT -6
This has been boiling for a while now in my "stomping grounds"... now that the media has actually been enticed to listen, I believe this is her death knell.
She's got no money, and when she loses her "credibility" argument... It's over.
|
|
|
|
Post by iammrhawkeyes on Mar 25, 2008 9:08:36 GMT -6
She misspoke?  |
|
|
|
Post by The Bluzmn on Mar 25, 2008 9:10:23 GMT -6
She misspoke? Brilliant! |
|
|
|
Post by idrinkthereforeiam on Mar 25, 2008 9:29:33 GMT -6
I am a libertarian.
I can't stand Republicans as a whole.
If I had to side with someone in elections, I normally vote Democrat. I have never voted for a Republican President.
This might be the first year I vote Republican.
I have to go take a shower now.
|
|
|
|
Post by 101 on Mar 25, 2008 9:30:53 GMT -6
Bluz....I couldn't agree with you more. This is simply another thing that reconfirms my thoughts that Billary will say anything and do absolutely anything that she thinks will get her elected.
I don't think she cares if what she says is true, what she says about others is true (i.e. Obama), or anything else.
She has got to be one of the most dishonest people that I can recall o the political scene. Time for her to shut the f_uck up and go away.
|
|
|
|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Mar 25, 2008 10:02:09 GMT -6
She said she misspoke, and then the Obama people found the speech in question, with the offending lie, on her website.
She is running a God awful campaign. Even the comedian Sinbad, who was with Hillary at the time, has been clowing on her. When you become comic fodder for Sinbad, you have reached rock bottom.
|
|
|
|
Post by idrinkthereforeiam on Mar 25, 2008 10:02:55 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by socal on Mar 25, 2008 10:14:05 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by 101 on Mar 25, 2008 10:20:22 GMT -6
How convenient that she "mis-spoke". Sounded like she had plenty of conviction in her voice when she was saying it.
I prefer to call it a lie. How stupid is she to think that this wasn't going to be uncovered?
|
|
|
|
Post by hawkeyescott on Mar 25, 2008 10:22:38 GMT -6
LMAO!!!! Well done Spank. |
|
|
|
Post by Iowafan1 on Mar 25, 2008 10:23:41 GMT -6
Hillary is Obama is Hillary is Obama is Hillary is Obama is Hillary, etc.......................................they are one and the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gumbyhawk on Mar 25, 2008 11:09:36 GMT -6
I am a libertarian. I can't stand Republicans as a whole. If I had to side with someone in elections, I normally vote Democrat. I have never voted for a Republican President. This might be the first year I vote Republican. I have to go take a shower now. Please don't, Spank! Be like me and write in Harrison Ford! Hell, he does a good job being President in the movies!  |
|
|
|
Post by idrinkthereforeiam on Mar 25, 2008 11:13:48 GMT -6
How can I argue with someone with that much Karma?
|
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Mar 25, 2008 11:14:50 GMT -6
Spank, the Libertarians will not be able to get any traction unless you support them in the election. You should vote for whatever libertarian is on the ballot in the hope that someday they'll get federal funding.
Since I am effectively disenfranchised in the presidential election because of the unconscionably large tax and transfer leftist population in Chicago like racerhawk and bucketochicken, I am debating throwing in a vote for ol' Ralph Nader. I want him to get federal funding so that the Green Party can split the Communist and Socialist vote and the Dems (Socialists) only get 25% of the vote on a going forward basis.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gumbyhawk on Mar 25, 2008 11:16:08 GMT -6
How can I argue with someone with that much Karma? ;D |
|
|
|
Post by socal on Mar 25, 2008 11:30:48 GMT -6
Spank, the Libertarians will not be able to get any traction unless you support them in the election. You should vote for whatever libertarian is on the ballot in the hope that someday they'll get federal funding. bince I am effectively disenfranchised in the presidential election because of the unconscionably large tax and transfer leftist population in Chicago like racerhawk and bucketochicken, I am debating throwing in a vote for ol' Ralph Nader. I want him to get federal funding so that the Green Party can split the Communist and Socialist vote and the Dems (Socialists) only get 25% of the vote on a going forward basis. What magical formula would allow this to work? As Nader isn't running on the Green ticket... As for your libertarian inferences, there is nothing forcing you to earn your money in - and live in the "leftist population" of Chicago. You are free to move to Kentucky or Mississippi. |
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Mar 25, 2008 11:37:49 GMT -6
Nader'll end up back on the Green Ticket. The good people of Kentucky and Mississippi are, in mnay cases, even bigger government liberals than the biggest government liberals on this board. They are fiscal liberals AND social conservatives who want the nanny state to regulate virtually everything a person does. At least in Chicago, I still don't have to wear trousers under my leather chaps.
|
|
|
|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Mar 25, 2008 11:42:15 GMT -6
Cynthia McKinney thinks you're a racist for thinking she can't have the Green nomination
|
|
|
|
Post by MoHawk on Mar 25, 2008 11:45:37 GMT -6
Nader'll end up back on the Green Ticket. The good people of Kentucky and Mississippi are, in mnay cases, even bigger government liberals than the biggest government liberals on this board. They are fiscal liberals AND social conservatives who want the nanny state to regulate virtually everything a person does. At least in Chicago, I still don't have to wear trousers under my leather chaps. Bad news ralph. Your picture is out on the web:  |
|
|
|
Post by socal on Mar 25, 2008 11:54:01 GMT -6
Bad news ralph. Your picture is out on the web: That would make the "crapping your pants at work" thing take on a whole new meaning... |
|
|
|
Post by 101 on Mar 25, 2008 12:04:33 GMT -6
Bad news ralph. Your picture is out on the web: That would make the "crapping your pants at work" thing take on a whole new meaning... OK...got a good laugh out of the crapping your pants at work comment, but MoHawk....was that picture entirely necessary? Damn...that should have been marked NSFW. Good god man. |
|
|
|
Post by NotMyKid on Mar 25, 2008 12:22:26 GMT -6
She misspoke? Add Sinbad next to her and you have a winner!  |
|
|
|
Post by MoHawk on Mar 25, 2008 12:33:34 GMT -6
Sorry 101. I'm just a reporter. All I do is relay the facts to you, the listener...or in this case reader. ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Mar 25, 2008 12:43:49 GMT -6
|
|
