|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Feb 5, 2020 12:05:54 GMT -6
You're aware that Bernout and Injun Liz are totally unelectable, right? Right? Please tell me that you understand this. Biden can't seem to find his footing. Pete is gay. Bloomberg, for the love of Mary, might be the only viable alternative. It will be Bloomberg. He’s spending so much cash advertising that he will have the name recognition by the time it’s over despite not being in debates and he may be the only one to beat trump. This country isn’t ready for a woman president. It doesn’t matter how qualified. Women are vilified no matter what, by men and other women. Pete hasn’t got a chance. I for one don’t like him. He’s got nothing special he’s bringing to the table. And he won’t win because he’s gay. ‘’murica isn’t ready for a woman president and they sure aren’t ready for a married gay one. Once the ignorants figure out he’s not only a nice looking young man but a married gay man, he’s done. I don’t like Bernie either. Never have. We are just fucked. I wish the big asteroid would just get here. With Biden flaming out, the DNC will pull out all of the stops to use anyone to stop Sanders. If they get desperate enough they just might chuck Hillary back out there.
|
|
|
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Feb 5, 2020 12:23:56 GMT -6
BLoomberg can fuck himself with a gold plated black dong. He won't be viable and won't get the nomination as he isn't playing the game right and has little recognition to most voters and is skipping the "little" states and instead targeting super tuesday. Biden won't win.
And Bernie or Warren are electable as is Buttigieg. Tell me naysayers, if you had to vote for Bernie or Trump, what the fuck would you do? Not vote and risk having Shitler in power 4 more years? Vote for Trump because "MAH SOCIALISM!"? Or would you vote that orange piece of shit out no matter who the nominee is. Vote him out and vote out every fucking Republican. They all fucking suck and are destroying our fucking country. The DNC of course will do their part to try to stop Bernie, and instead fuck over the party because it will hurt their pockets.
|
|
|
Post by A boy named Sioux on Feb 5, 2020 15:18:55 GMT -6
I gotta say in a trump vs bernie or warren choice, I'm going 4 more years. Mayor Pete or Amy, or maybe even creepy uncle Joe would be different.
|
|
|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Feb 5, 2020 15:37:04 GMT -6
I gotta say in a trump vs bernie or warren choice, I'm going 4 more years. Mayor Pete or Amy, or maybe even creepy uncle Joe would be different. LMAO
|
|
|
Post by A boy named Sioux on Feb 5, 2020 16:31:17 GMT -6
Here is the thing Billy. I dont have any student loans to forgive, and I do have considerable assets I dont want plundered.
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Feb 5, 2020 17:44:34 GMT -6
Here is the thing Billy. I dont have any student loans to forgive, and I do have considerable assets I dont want plundered. Racist. It's greedy assholes like you who are ruining America.
|
|
|
Post by socal on Feb 5, 2020 20:24:13 GMT -6
Here is the thing Billy. I dont have any student loans to forgive, and I do have considerable assets I dont want plundered. Bullshit. I guaran-fucking-tee you don't have the level of assets they will be taking 2% of. Hell, Pard has a long ways to go to get into the ballpark. ...nobody wants to confiscate your F150 and porn.
|
|
|
Post by A boy named Sioux on Feb 5, 2020 21:53:07 GMT -6
You are god damn dreaming of you really think just the uber rich would get tapped to pay for all the give aways they have promised. Plus, the uber rich will be able to avoid giving up their wealth, so that money will have to come from a lower level.
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Feb 6, 2020 0:02:53 GMT -6
You are god damn dreaming of you really think just the uber rich would get tapped to pay for all the give aways they have promised. Plus, the uber rich will be able to avoid giving up their wealth, so that money will have to come from a lower level. He's not wrong. Liz and Bernout, while not the aberrant human failures that Trump is, are totally full of shit, and while Republicans have exactly zero standing regarding fiscal responsibility, they're not automatically wrong if they claim that Liz and Bern's policy ideas are completely financially bogus and predicated upon lies. Still, they're not the national security threats that Trump is. Fuck that asshole. I'd vote for rabid hyena over that prick. At least the rabid hyena wouldn't be sucking off every murderous authoritarian who crossed its path. Biden has empathy and vast experience. He's serviceable. Bloomberg is actually a successful businessman, not a fucking fraud like Trump. Either of them would be fine. I've spent a lot of time in South Bend, and it's a fucking shithole, but Pete seems smart enough that he'd appoint the right people. Also Nikki Haley is in fact a cunt. www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/12/08/nikki-haley-gets-history-confederate-flag-very-wrong/Stupid pandering bitch.
|
|
|
Post by Earl Slick on Feb 6, 2020 8:31:39 GMT -6
So once again our process provides a choice between two unacceptable candidates. Great. Hey, it’s a 100% increase from no choice at all.
|
|
|
Post by A boy named Sioux on Feb 6, 2020 9:19:58 GMT -6
You are god damn dreaming of you really think just the uber rich would get tapped to pay for all the give aways they have promised. Plus, the uber rich will be able to avoid giving up their wealth, so that money will have to come from a lower level. He's not wrong. Liz and Bernout, while not the aberrant human failures that Trump is, are totally full of shit, and while Republicans have exactly zero standing regarding fiscal responsibility, they're not automatically wrong if they claim that Liz and Bern's policy ideas are completely financially bogus and predicated upon lies. Still, they're not the national security threats that Trump is. Fuck that asshole. I'd vote for rabid hyena over that prick. At least the rabid hyena wouldn't be sucking off every murderous authoritarian who crossed its path. Biden has empathy and vast experience. He's serviceable. Bloomberg is actually a successful businessman, not a fucking fraud like Trump. Either of them would be fine. I've spent a lot of time in South Bend, and it's a fucking shithole, but Pete seems smart enough that he'd appoint the right people. Also Nikki Haley is in fact a cunt. www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/12/08/nikki-haley-gets-history-confederate-flag-very-wrong/Stupid pandering bitch. Thor, find a way to get said rabid hyena on the ballot, and I will give it serious consideration.
|
|
|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Feb 6, 2020 9:36:27 GMT -6
Here is the thing Billy. I dont have any student loans to forgive, and I do have considerable assets I dont want plundered. Here's the thing Sue, the Democrats shouldn't be concerned about attracting life long Republicans like you who don't like Trump, but will vote for him no matter who the Dems nominate.
|
|
|
Post by A boy named Sioux on Feb 6, 2020 9:53:18 GMT -6
You're missing the point ghost. If the Dems dont pick a whackadoodle socialist, dissatisfied Reps would vote for their candidate and lead to a victory for them. It is their only path to the White House. Pick a moderate and they win in a landslide.
|
|
|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Feb 6, 2020 10:51:07 GMT -6
You're missing the point ghost. If the Dems dont pick a whackadoodle socialist, dissatisfied Reps would vote for their candidate and lead to a victory for them. It is their only path to the White House. Pick a moderate and they win in a landslide. They picked a moderate last time and she lost the midwest. Remember in 2004 when Democrats nominated a safe choice to run an easy election against an unpopular Republican? Republicans aren't going to vote for the Democrats. Trump has a 90% approval rating among Republicans. If the Democrats waste their energy trying to get Republicans to vote for a Democrat, they will lose. You know damn well when push comes to shove, you're not pulling the lever for Michael Bloomburg, so stop blowing smoke up my ass. Here's the brass tacks my friend: 30% of eligible voters didn't vote in 2016. 33% of those non-voters were under 30. 48% of non-voters were people of color. 56% of the non-voters were people making less that $30k. What the Democrats NEED to do, and what worked when Obama won in a landslide in 2008, is instead of trying to scrape by with the scraps of the 10% who don't like Trump, engage the 30% who are alienated by the system and don't participate because no one cares about them. 300,000 fewer people voted in Ohio in 2016 than 2008. 200,000 fewer people voted in Wisconsin in 2016 than 2008. That's your margin of victory right there.
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Feb 6, 2020 12:10:17 GMT -6
They picked a moderate last time and she lost the midwest. Remember in 2004 when Democrats nominated a safe choice to run an easy election against an unpopular Republican? "Moderate" or whatever doesn't fucking matter. What matters is whether or not you have a good candidate. Obama was the best fucking candidate in decades. Trump is also a really fucking good candidate. Those guys are leaders. Same with Bill Clinton. Gore and Kerry were noodle armed blow dried college boys who don't exude big dick energy. Hillary was Hillary and her campaign was probably toast the moment she got tossed into that meat wagon like a side of beef after suffering a heat stroke on a balmy 72 degree day. That said, had the wildcard Trump not entered the election and Hillary had drawn some old line chamber of commerce GOP choade like Low Energy Jeb! then Hillary would have won, but a good candidate appeared and she got her ass kicked. You guys are so god damned deranged that you don't even understand that Trump is a good candidate. When you roll out a god damned defeatist message that everything is so fucking bad you really don't inspire people to go vote for you. You do it with a big dick energy message like "Hope and Change" or "Make America Great Again" delivered by someone who can immediately resonate with tens of millions of people.
|
|
Other
Sports Moderator
Interim Master of the Universe
Posts: 5,202
Tits or GTFO: GTFO
|
Post by Other on Feb 6, 2020 12:40:31 GMT -6
dissatisfied Reps would vote for their candidate and lead to a victory for them. It is their only path to the White House. Pick a moderate and they win in a landslide. I have never seen or otherwise experienced anything in my life that would even remotely suggest what you're saying is accurate.
|
|
Other
Sports Moderator
Interim Master of the Universe
Posts: 5,202
Tits or GTFO: GTFO
|
Post by Other on Feb 6, 2020 12:41:03 GMT -6
You're missing the point ghost. If the Dems dont pick a whackadoodle socialist, dissatisfied Reps would vote for their candidate and lead to a victory for them. It is their only path to the White House. Pick a moderate and they win in a landslide. They picked a moderate last time and she lost the midwest. Remember in 2004 when Democrats nominated a safe choice to run an easy election against an unpopular Republican? Republicans aren't going to vote for the Democrats. Trump has a 90% approval rating among Republicans. If the Democrats waste their energy trying to get Republicans to vote for a Democrat, they will lose. You know damn well when push comes to shove, you're not pulling the lever for Michael Bloomburg, so stop blowing smoke up my ass. Here's the brass tacks my friend: 30% of eligible voters didn't vote in 2016. 33% of those non-voters were under 30. 48% of non-voters were people of color. 56% of the non-voters were people making less that $30k. What the Democrats NEED to do, and what worked when Obama won in a landslide in 2008, is instead of trying to scrape by with the scraps of the 10% who don't like Trump, engage the 30% who are alienated by the system and don't participate because no one cares about them. 300,000 fewer people voted in Ohio in 2016 than 2008. 200,000 fewer people voted in Wisconsin in 2016 than 2008. That's your margin of victory right there. Ghost 2020!
|
|
|
Post by A boy named Sioux on Feb 6, 2020 13:17:12 GMT -6
You're missing the point ghost. If the Dems dont pick a whackadoodle socialist, dissatisfied Reps would vote for their candidate and lead to a victory for them. It is their only path to the White House. Pick a moderate and they win in a landslide. They picked a moderate last time and she lost the midwest. Remember in 2004 when Democrats nominated a safe choice to run an easy election against an unpopular Republican? Republicans aren't going to vote for the Democrats. Trump has a 90% approval rating among Republicans. If the Democrats waste their energy trying to get Republicans to vote for a Democrat, they will lose. You know damn well when push comes to shove, you're not pulling the lever for Michael Bloomburg, so stop blowing smoke up my ass. Here's the brass tacks my friend: 30% of eligible voters didn't vote in 2016. 33% of those non-voters were under 30. 48% of non-voters were people of color. 56% of the non-voters were people making less that $30k. What the Democrats NEED to do, and what worked when Obama won in a landslide in 2008, is instead of trying to scrape by with the scraps of the 10% who don't like Trump, engage the 30% who are alienated by the system and don't participate because no one cares about them. 300,000 fewer people voted in Ohio in 2016 than 2008. 200,000 fewer people voted in Wisconsin in 2016 than 2008. That's your margin of victory right there. I should have included, the moderate selected cant be a toxic waste dump like Hildawg.
|
|
|
Post by Stan's Field on Feb 6, 2020 18:58:11 GMT -6
You're missing the point ghost. If the Dems dont pick a whackadoodle socialist, dissatisfied Reps would vote for their candidate and lead to a victory for them. It is their only path to the White House. Pick a moderate and they win in a landslide. They picked a moderate last time and she lost the midwest. Remember in 2004 when Democrats nominated a safe choice to run an easy election against an unpopular Republican? Republicans aren't going to vote for the Democrats. Trump has a 90% approval rating among Republicans. If the Democrats waste their energy trying to get Republicans to vote for a Democrat, they will lose. You know damn well when push comes to shove, you're not pulling the lever for Michael Bloomburg, so stop blowing smoke up my ass. Here's the brass tacks my friend: 30% of eligible voters didn't vote in 2016. 33% of those non-voters were under 30. 48% of non-voters were people of color. 56% of the non-voters were people making less that $30k. What the Democrats NEED to do, and what worked when Obama won in a landslide in 2008, is instead of trying to scrape by with the scraps of the 10% who don't like Trump, engage the 30% who are alienated by the system and don't participate because no one cares about them. 300,000 fewer people voted in Ohio in 2016 than 2008. 200,000 fewer people voted in Wisconsin in 2016 than 2008. That's your margin of victory right there. So people who aren't "cared about" and might not expect to be, for reasons of their own that may be good said fucking reasons like legit disgust and serious God damned concerns with leadership in this country, need to be lied to in order to secure their vote?
|
|
|
Post by A boy named Sioux on Feb 6, 2020 19:10:26 GMT -6
Yes that about wraps it up. FYI, none of these candidates give two shits about your hypothetical needy voter.
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Feb 7, 2020 8:20:22 GMT -6
Bernie wasn’t viable at mine in dsm. It was the best part. Lulz. My guess is there is either a really close 3 or 4 way race, but due to caucus fuckery whoever got the most votes if counted individually (maybe Bern) is sitting in 3rd or some shit and that "pro bono" DNC scumbag lawyer who conveniently shows up whenever the Dems have an issue is trying to concoct a cover story because people are gonna be pissed off. "We have to reconcile our sudden love of the popular vote with Bernie winning by 2,000 votes and getting third." Welp, looks like Bernie won the popular vote by just under 3,000 votes and is sitting in second. LULZ.
|
|
|
Post by TaterWanger on Feb 7, 2020 8:30:41 GMT -6
Lulz. My guess is there is either a really close 3 or 4 way race, but due to caucus fuckery whoever got the most votes if counted individually (maybe Bern) is sitting in 3rd or some shit and that "pro bono" DNC scumbag lawyer who conveniently shows up whenever the Dems have an issue is trying to concoct a cover story because people are gonna be pissed off. "We have to reconcile our sudden love of the popular vote with Bernie winning by 2,000 votes and getting third." Welp, looks like Bernie won the popular vote by just under 3,000 votes and is sitting in second. LULZ. Reminds me of a Dipshit president I know...
|
|
|
Post by egadsto on Feb 7, 2020 9:16:11 GMT -6
|
|
Other
Sports Moderator
Interim Master of the Universe
Posts: 5,202
Tits or GTFO: GTFO
|
Post by Other on Feb 7, 2020 10:12:35 GMT -6
Yeah..... he means they can't investigate Trump. But by all means republican voters keep enabling this shit, what could go wrong?
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Feb 7, 2020 13:20:45 GMT -6
Yeah..... he means they can't investigate Trump. But by all means republican voters keep enabling this shit, what could go wrong? This all reminds me of the sordid history of a certain country I'm from.
|
|