|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Feb 19, 2019 18:25:28 GMT -6
That kid in the MAGA hat is suing the WaPo for $250 million. His lawyer ain't some strip mall ambulance chaser. He's won a metric fuckton of cash on defamation and privacy torts suits. Gonna be a lot of "Learn to Code" tweets if that kid wins the lawsuit.
|
|
|
|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Feb 19, 2019 21:13:47 GMT -6
Every black person that kid has interacted with is going to be a celebrity
|
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Feb 20, 2019 0:30:30 GMT -6
Give me a fucking break. That dumbass little magat might be a hero to the idiot fucks who watch FOX but he won’t be one to a DC jury.
|
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Feb 20, 2019 7:04:12 GMT -6
Give me a fucking break. That dumbass little magat might be a hero to the idiot fucks who watch FOX but he won’t be one to a DC jury. ROFLCopter. Ain't read the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in awhile, ehh chap? This kid filed in Kentucky and they're gonna have a helluva time changing venue. Biggest issue is going to be getting personal jurisdiction on the "celebrities" that he plans to sue. I can't imagine the long arm statute will be able to get Alyssa Milano or Kathy Griffin so they'll have to figure out a way to get them into the state so they can corner them in a Wendy's bathroom and serve them there. Gawd I can't fucking wait until next week so I can jettison all of my knowledge of personal jurisdiction, venue and the FRCP. |
|
|
|
Post by Earl Slick on Feb 20, 2019 9:51:42 GMT -6
I don’t care if that kid saved a baby from drowning in a bathtub that was inside of a burning house, he still has a face that just begs to be punched.
|
|
|
|
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Feb 20, 2019 10:05:25 GMT -6
Snowflakes always get butthurt. That kid ain't getting nothing, as I bet the Wapo has a deeper legal bench that will just bankrupt his family trying to get a payday.
|
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Feb 20, 2019 10:16:20 GMT -6
Give me a fucking break. That dumbass little magat might be a hero to the idiot fucks who watch FOX but he won’t be one to a DC jury. ROFLCopter. Ain't read the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in awhile, ehh chap? This kid filed in Kentucky and they're gonna have a helluva time changing venue. Biggest issue is going to be getting personal jurisdiction on the "celebrities" that he plans to sue. I can't imagine the long arm statute will be able to get Alyssa Milano or Kathy Griffin so they'll have to figure out a way to get them into the state so they can corner them in a Wendy's bathroom and serve them there. Gawd I can't fucking wait until next week so I can jettison all of my knowledge of personal jurisdiction, venue and the FRCP. Maybe. I bet Bezos’ fellas can get venue moved. Did you read the petition? Jesus. Those hack lawyers claim that waPo “defamed” this little cocksucker to punish trump. I hope Bezos crushes this little fuck and his shitbag family. Let’s see... a bunch of teen boys in MAGAT lids bus into DC to protest women’s reproductive rights. Instigating a scene was the whole fucking point. Crush them, Jeff. |
|
|
|
Post by BrainFerentz4Prez on Feb 20, 2019 18:55:32 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Feb 21, 2019 10:04:19 GMT -6
Stingray Steve will have control in the first half, but completely fall apart in the 2nd. |
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Feb 21, 2019 13:08:41 GMT -6
Stingray Steve will have control in the first half, but completely fall apart in the 2nd. The question stands: How can one look like a child and a child molester at the same time?  |
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jan 7, 2020 15:14:02 GMT -6
Kid got a settlement out of CNN. Terms not disclosed.
|
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Jan 7, 2020 19:23:07 GMT -6
Kid got a settlement out of CNN. Terms not disclosed. Fuck that kid and the horse who rode his mom in on |
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jan 8, 2020 8:39:10 GMT -6
Kid got a settlement out of CNN. Terms not disclosed. Fuck that kid and the horse who rode his mom in on  |
|
|
|
Post by The Resistance on Jan 8, 2020 9:38:37 GMT -6
That boy may want to invest in a door company because he's far from done. Those knobs going to keep getting lower each settlement.
|
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Jan 8, 2020 10:17:24 GMT -6
That boy may want to invest in a door company because he's far from done. Those knobs going to keep getting lower each settlement. I'm at a loss as to why anyone is settling with this little cunt. He was there fronting the old Injun, and they recorded it. You can't go into a public space and engage in public demonstrations and expect privacy. |
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Jan 8, 2020 10:18:29 GMT -6
Fuck that kid and the horse who rode his mom in on Why would I be mad? I'm not the one doing the Lindsey Graham pilot fish impression on this site. |
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jan 8, 2020 12:00:38 GMT -6
That boy may want to invest in a door company because he's far from done. Those knobs going to keep getting lower each settlement. I'm at a loss as to why anyone is settling with this little cunt. He was there fronting the old Injun, and they recorded it. You can't go into a public space and engage in public demonstrations and expect privacy. You're at a loss as to why CNN would settle? If you were representing CNN and your client was in the business of peddling fake news, would you really want to go through prolonged discovery opposite a "king of torts" guy who has insanely deep pockets and has won several huge jury verdicts? Hell, Project Veritas alone has hours of tape of CNN morons admitting what the world already knows, namely that they hate Orange Man and that they actively try to create controversy because it drives ratings and web views. And that's just employees and guys like Don Lemon communicating to random strangers. Imagine the shit that would turn up in discovery. It would significantly impair any shred of credibility or partiality CNN is desperately trying to preserve. Even if CNN won on the merits, it would have been a Pyrrhic victory. The young man's primary claims were of the defamation/false light variety, not the privacy type of claims that shut down Gawker when they published private videos of Hulk Hogan, so "privacy" is not really the crux of it. The kid was literally standing there waiting for a bus when the elder approached him and banged a drum in his face. Supposedly "credible news" sources gave that elder airtime without a shred of due diligence and proceeded to drag that kid through the mud. www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/02/03/nick_sandmann_the_truth_in_15_minutes.html |
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Jan 10, 2020 9:52:04 GMT -6
I'm at a loss as to why anyone is settling with this little cunt. He was there fronting the old Injun, and they recorded it. You can't go into a public space and engage in public demonstrations and expect privacy. You're at a loss as to why CNN would settle? If you were representing CNN and your client was in the business of peddling fake news, would you really want to go through prolonged discovery opposite a "king of torts" guy who has insanely deep pockets and has won several huge jury verdicts? Hell, Project Veritas alone has hours of tape of CNN morons admitting what the world already knows, namely that they hate Orange Man and that they actively try to create controversy because it drives ratings and web views. And that's just employees and guys like Don Lemon communicating to random strangers. Imagine the shit that would turn up in discovery. It would significantly impair any shred of credibility or partiality CNN is desperately trying to preserve. Even if CNN won on the merits, it would have been a Pyrrhic victory. The young man's primary claims were of the defamation/false light variety, not the privacy type of claims that shut down Gawker when they published private videos of Hulk Hogan, so "privacy" is not really the crux of it. The kid was literally standing there waiting for a bus when the elder approached him and banged a drum in his face. Supposedly "credible news" sources gave that elder airtime without a shred of due diligence and proceeded to drag that kid through the mud. www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/02/03/nick_sandmann_the_truth_in_15_minutes.html"Peddling fake news?" Fuck off. The little MAGAT was at a political rally to restrict women's rights. Fuck him. I wonder if this little cuckadoodle will sue the media too. |
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jan 10, 2020 11:32:33 GMT -6
You're at a loss as to why CNN would settle? If you were representing CNN and your client was in the business of peddling fake news, would you really want to go through prolonged discovery opposite a "king of torts" guy who has insanely deep pockets and has won several huge jury verdicts? Hell, Project Veritas alone has hours of tape of CNN morons admitting what the world already knows, namely that they hate Orange Man and that they actively try to create controversy because it drives ratings and web views. And that's just employees and guys like Don Lemon communicating to random strangers. Imagine the shit that would turn up in discovery. It would significantly impair any shred of credibility or partiality CNN is desperately trying to preserve. Even if CNN won on the merits, it would have been a Pyrrhic victory. The young man's primary claims were of the defamation/false light variety, not the privacy type of claims that shut down Gawker when they published private videos of Hulk Hogan, so "privacy" is not really the crux of it. The kid was literally standing there waiting for a bus when the elder approached him and banged a drum in his face. Supposedly "credible news" sources gave that elder airtime without a shred of due diligence and proceeded to drag that kid through the mud. www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/02/03/nick_sandmann_the_truth_in_15_minutes.html"Peddling fake news?" Fuck off. The little MAGAT was at a political rally to restrict women's rights. Fuck him. I wonder if this little cuckadoodle will sue the media too. So is the current state of the law such that the fake news can make up a story about a person if they disagree with that person's political opinions? I don't recall reading that exception in Con Law or Torts, but perhaps it was in some dicta somewhere that I missed. Look, bud, here's one big problem today. There are a lot of news channels and outlets and their business sucks. Too much competition, ad rates dropping, people are tuning out. Basically race baiting has become a really easy story that can draw some clicks. You don't actually have to have a reporter out there, you just take someone else's story, get some quotes from two Angry Studies professors to the effect of "The President's violent rhetoric has enabled this" and then click the "submit" button. The problem is that pretty much all the biggest ones end up being completely fucking fake. But the demand for racism and stories about it is seemingly high, and you can't deprive your customer of what they want. The media has to keep that narrative going strong. Even you can sniff out some of them, as you claimed you did in the Smollett case: hnwasteland.proboards.com/thread/9163/ha-knew . I recall you doing the same eons ago on the old politics board in the Duke Lacrosse case. I get that you hate the kid, that's fine, but you are smart enough to see the bigger picture here. Journalists don't exercise any degree of due diligence any longer, they simply have a narrative and come up with shit to reinforce it. |
|
|
|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Jan 14, 2020 8:25:12 GMT -6
It's very funny that you think CNN would be driven by a partisan bias, when they are driven by a desire for profit, desire for access, and above all, a desire not to venture too far away from Manhattan or a few select neighborhoods in DC.
In reality, while most CNN journalists are neo-liberal dweebs who would lock their door if Ilhan Omar walked by their car, what's motivating their reporting isn't trying to own Trump, but rather trying to get invited
|
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jan 14, 2020 9:01:18 GMT -6
It's very funny that you think CNN would be driven by a partisan bias, when they are driven by a desire for profit, desire for access, and above all, a desire not to venture too far away from Manhattan or a few select neighborhoods in DC. In reality, while most CNN journalists are neo-liberal dweebs who would lock their door if Ilhan Omar walked by their car, what's motivating their reporting isn't trying to own Trump, but rather trying to get invited CNN has an annuity from cable TV contracts. Ad rates are soft across the board for their platform, but they are just fine pimping the shit that their corporate masters want pimped. |
|
|
|
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Jan 14, 2020 13:16:56 GMT -6
It's very funny that you think CNN would be driven by a partisan bias, when they are driven by a desire for profit, desire for access, and above all, a desire not to venture too far away from Manhattan or a few select neighborhoods in DC. In reality, while most CNN journalists are neo-liberal dweebs who would lock their door if Ilhan Omar walked by their car, what's motivating their reporting isn't trying to own Trump, but rather trying to get invited CNN has an annuity from cable TV contracts. Ad rates are soft across the board for their platform, but they are just fine pimping the shit that their corporate masters want pimped. I don't think the corporate masters tell them what stories to run. I think they tell them what stories NOT to run. OK to run: Orange man bad Orange man not so bad White people in rural diner answering stupid questions Benghazi Not OK to run: These people were friends with Jeffery Epstein |
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jan 14, 2020 13:38:50 GMT -6
CNN has an annuity from cable TV contracts. Ad rates are soft across the board for their platform, but they are just fine pimping the shit that their corporate masters want pimped. I don't think the corporate masters tell them what stories to run. I think they tell them what stories NOT to run. OK to run: Orange man bad Orange man not so bad White people in rural diner answering stupid questions Benghazi Not OK to run: These people were friends with Jeffery Epstein Yeah, I smell what you're cooking. I think the other one that is not OK to run is anything painting immigration in a negative light. The 5 dozen companies that pay for the bulk of advertising want an ever growing domestic market and low wages. |
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Oct 1, 2020 17:57:06 GMT -6
ROFLCopter. Ain't read the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in awhile, ehh chap? This kid filed in Kentucky and they're gonna have a helluva time changing venue. Biggest issue is going to be getting personal jurisdiction on the "celebrities" that he plans to sue. I can't imagine the long arm statute will be able to get Alyssa Milano or Kathy Griffin so they'll have to figure out a way to get them into the state so they can corner them in a Wendy's bathroom and serve them there. Gawd I can't fucking wait until next week so I can jettison all of my knowledge of personal jurisdiction, venue and the FRCP. Maybe. I bet Bezos’ fellas can get venue moved. Did you read the petition? Jesus. Those hack lawyers claim that waPo “defamed” this little cocksucker to punish trump. I hope Bezos crushes this little fuck and his shitbag family. Let’s see... a bunch of teen boys in MAGAT lids bus into DC to protest women’s reproductive rights. Instigating a scene was the whole fucking point. Crush them, Jeff. Bezos' lawyers didn't get venue moved but were wise to settle when they did. Ol' Lin Wood still has it. Motion to dismiss denied for NYT, Rolling Stone, ABC and CBS. Break out the checkbook, fellas. I take it you never watched the video of what actually transpired, did you? thepostmillennial.com/breaking-new-york-times-rolling-stone-abc-and-cbs-all-denied-motions-to-dismiss-lawsuit-brought-by-covington-teen-nick-sandmann |
|
