|
Post by Chuck Storm on Jun 3, 2008 20:11:29 GMT -6
Terms of the sale are:
Purchase Price: $0 Purchased Assets: Hippies, Wineries, Feminists, Berkeley and all other citizens resident in the Peoples Republic of California as of the Closing Date. Excluded Assets: Disneyland, the LA Dodgers, the LA Lakers, the USC Trojan Cheerleaders, Megan Fox and what's left of the clocktower from Back to the Future Assumed Liabilities: All outstanding liabilities of the United States federal government (including, by way of example and not limitation, all debts run by big government liberals like George Dubya Bush, all pension liabilities accrued as of the Closing Date Representations and Warranties: None (as is, where is) Earnout: 50% of the gross receipts of the next Transformers movie Real Property License: All existing United States military bases
Willing to take other suggestions as to terms, but this is the basic framework. The investment banking/law firm of BTR and Autolykos LLP will take a 7% transaction fee to be paid by Buyer, whether or not the transaction closes.
|
|
|
Post by socal on Jun 3, 2008 21:35:56 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jun 3, 2008 21:38:19 GMT -6
Excluded Assets: the Pr0n industry; the Reagan Liberry and all artificacts related to Ron and Nancy
Pre-Closing Covenant: Seller shall be permitted to drive up to 1000 buses full of people into California and the occupants of the buses shall not be given passports to travel back into territory controlled by Seller.
Post-Closing Covenant: No later than 180 days after the Closing Date, Buyer shall build a 25 foot high 3 foot thick wall between Buyer and Seller.
Financial Covenants: All debt shall be repaid in US dollars. Certain officials of Seller will be required to execute personal guaranties guaranteeing the debt of BTR and his cronies against default. Liens will be placed on all Post-Closing assets of Mexico.
|
|
|
Post by socal on Jun 3, 2008 21:45:04 GMT -6
Country GNP's as US States: PS, can I sell you two some property in West Virginia... so you can reside with your sister/wife & young'uns - along with the rest of the conservatives?
|
|
|
Post by Iowafan1 on Jun 4, 2008 0:07:40 GMT -6
I thought we gave California away years ago by proxy. Do Americans still live there?
|
|
|
Post by Chuck Storm on Jun 4, 2008 7:41:13 GMT -6
Country GNP's as US States: PS, can I sell you two some property in West Virginia... so you can reside with your sister/wife & young'uns - along with the rest of the conservatives? Pretty interesting map. Spelled Morocco wrong though. Do you think we'd be able to get a better purchase price by selling California to France? We were thinking that Mexico, as a strategic buyer, would be able to offer the best price, but bince there's so much similarity between California and France now, maybe the frogs would be interested. They'd certainly be a much lower credit risk than Mexico. Of course, if we're going to do that, we may as well sell California to Japan, bince they'll just invade after the French take control anyway and Nancy Pelosi and her liberal allies will be tripping over each other to see who can surrender first.
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jun 4, 2008 7:56:25 GMT -6
I assume socal is not in favor of this brilliant idea. I love how the libs rant and rave about the deficit/debt and then when someone proposes a strategic divestiture to bolster our financial standing, the libs get all up in arms about it.
As a rider to the terms, I propose that the government hold a referendum on the internets where every citizen has to register to vote and the voting is not anonymous. Any citizen who votes NO on the measure shall have a one time special NO tax of their pro rata share of all of the US's sovereign debt, US Gov. pension liabilities, and accrued yet unpaid SS and Medicare liabilities tacked on to their form 1040 for the year following the Closing. If they can't pay the debt, it will accrue interest at the standard IRS penalty rate. We'll still assign the debt to Mexico, but having some liberal elites backstopping it as well might help ensure it gets satisfied in full, assuming the liberal elites have jobs. Maybe that will stop the complaining about taxes being too low, too.
|
|
|
Post by socal on Jun 4, 2008 8:25:16 GMT -6
I assume socal is not in favor of this brilliant idea. I love how the libs rant and rave about the deficit/debt and then when someone proposes a strategic divestiture to bolster our financial standing, the libs get all up in arms about it. As a rider to the terms, I propose that the government hold a referendum on the internets where every citizen has to register to vote and the voting is not anonymous. Any citizen who votes NO on the measure shall have a one time special NO tax of their pro rata share of all of the US's sovereign debt, US Gov. pension liabilities, and accrued yet unpaid SS and Medicare liabilities tacked on to their form 1040 for the year following the Closing. If they can't pay the debt, it will accrue interest at the standard IRS penalty rate. We'll still assign the debt to Mexico, but having some liberal elites backstopping it as well might help ensure it gets satisfied in full, assuming the liberal elites have jobs. Maybe that will stop the complaining about taxes being too low, too. That would be an interesting feat, as a good portion of the servers allowing this action are housed in California... not including the technology that allows it to happen. While conservatives would simply be happy having the non-California entities "BUD" & "PFE" (for Viagra) available to them, proposing the divesting of a State that creates more everything... is quite a stupid thought - even using the Conservative Scale of Ignorance. Also, every flag the conservatives wrap themselves up in - would be outdated. PS, think of all the disgusting things Mexifornians would do to the rotting corpse of Dear Ronald... and where would the GOP be able to use as their Mecca if the Reagan Library is sold off?
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jun 4, 2008 8:29:47 GMT -6
Oh, I guess I didn't understand that servers and technology must be present in the nation in which the end user is located in order to grant access to the internets.
We'll take care of the flag issue by granting Puerto Rico statehood on the closing.
And, all artifacts related to Regan are excluded assets, that means we keep them. What other problems do you have with the plan because you have quite an impressive list of non-issues to lead with.
|
|
|
Post by socal on Jun 4, 2008 8:43:46 GMT -6
Oh, I guess I didn't understand that servers and technology must be present in the nation in which the end user is located in order to grant access to the internets. We'll take care of the flag issue by granting Puerto Rico statehood on the closing. And, all artifacts related to Regan are excluded assets, that means we keep them. What other problems do you have with the plan because you have quite an impressive list of non-issues to lead with. Your cohort saw fit to include the remaining portions of the Back to the Future clocktower instead of the deceased body of Reagan. As neither you, nor he have excluded it - I propose a weekly Mexifornia Reagan skull-fucking ceremony. So, you can keep your rights here: www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=7561251... and do with as you please.
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jun 4, 2008 9:11:53 GMT -6
Oh, I guess I didn't understand that servers and technology must be present in the nation in which the end user is located in order to grant access to the internets. We'll take care of the flag issue by granting Puerto Rico statehood on the closing. And, all artifacts related to Regan are excluded assets, that means we keep them. What other problems do you have with the plan because you have quite an impressive list of non-issues to lead with. Your cohort saw fit to include the remaining portions of the Back to the Future clocktower instead of the deceased body of Reagan. As neither you, nor he have excluded it - I propose a weekly Mexifornia Reagan skull-fucking ceremony. So, you can keep your rights here: www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=7561251... and do with as you please. Take a closer look back through the posts - anything that is an exlcuded asset is something that does not transfer upon the sale. The US keeps all that stuff. Artifacts related to Ron will be a dfined term and will definitely include his body. I just didn't want to lawyer the term sheet all up. We'll get the LOI signed and then in the definitive purchase agreement hammer out those details. I think we have identified the most significant things in California and sought to exclude them. Now you can sit and quabble with your tired, predictable partisan rants, or you can help us identify other carveouts so we don't give away too much in connection with the sale. The support for the plan is overwhelming at this stage.
|
|
|
Post by jwiley10 on Jun 4, 2008 9:30:12 GMT -6
Can we include Pebble Beach as an excluded asset as well? If so, I'm on board. Draft the LOI and allow Mexico to do their due diligence.
|
|
|
Post by socal on Jun 4, 2008 9:39:39 GMT -6
Oh, I guess I didn't understand that servers and technology must be present in the nation in which the end user is located in order to grant access to the internets. We'll take care of the flag issue by granting Puerto Rico statehood on the closing. And, all artifacts related to Regan are excluded assets, that means we keep them. What other problems do you have with the plan because you have quite an impressive list of non-issues to lead with. Your cohort saw fit to include the remaining portions of the Back to the Future clocktower instead of the deceased body of Reagan. As neither you, nor he have excluded it - I propose a weekly Mexifornia Reagan skull-fucking ceremony. So, you can keep your rights here: www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=7561251... and do with as you please. Take a closer look back through the posts - anything that is an exlcuded asset is something that does not transfer upon the sale. The US keeps all that stuff. Artifacts related to Ron will be a dfined term and will definitely include his body. I just didn't want to lawyer the term sheet all up. We'll get the LOI signed and then in the definitive purchase agreement hammer out those details. I think we have identified the most significant things in California and sought to exclude them. Now you can sit and quabble with your tired, predictable partisan rants, or you can help us identify other carveouts so we don't give away too much in connection with the sale. The support for the plan is overwhelming at this stage. As I said. Mexifornia claims no rights to any Regan assets. But they will commence the fucking of Reagan's skull. Perhaps for $50 or a red sweater as trade, you could get your turn.
|
|
|
Post by Chuck Storm on Jun 4, 2008 9:44:13 GMT -6
Oh, I guess I didn't understand that servers and technology must be present in the nation in which the end user is located in order to grant access to the internets. We'll take care of the flag issue by granting Puerto Rico statehood on the closing. And, all artifacts related to Regan are excluded assets, that means we keep them. What other problems do you have with the plan because you have quite an impressive list of non-issues to lead with. Take a closer look back through the posts - anything that is an exlcuded asset is something that does not transfer upon the sale. The US keeps all that stuff. Artifacts related to Ron will be a dfined term and will definitely include his body. I just didn't want to lawyer the term sheet all up. We'll get the LOI signed and then in the definitive purchase agreement hammer out those details. I think we have identified the most significant things in California and sought to exclude them. Now you can sit and quabble with your tired, predictable partisan rants, or you can help us identify other carveouts so we don't give away too much in connection with the sale. The support for the plan is overwhelming at this stage. As I said. Mexifornia claims no rights to any Regan assets. But they will commence the fucking of Reagan's skull. Perhaps for $50 or a red sweater as trade, you could get your turn. While I generally think your obsession with skull f***ing is about a 9.5 on the creepiness scale, you're misunderstanding the concept of property. The right to property entails not only the right to use an asset, but to stop others from using it. For example, I own a dog. Owning the dog allows me not only to walk the dog, but to prevent you from humping it after you run out of skulls to f***. Now, I know you don't believe in private property, but it's a concept that's germane to US and Mexican law and would govern the terms of our agreement.
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jun 4, 2008 9:51:38 GMT -6
Oh, I guess I didn't understand that servers and technology must be present in the nation in which the end user is located in order to grant access to the internets. We'll take care of the flag issue by granting Puerto Rico statehood on the closing. And, all artifacts related to Regan are excluded assets, that means we keep them. What other problems do you have with the plan because you have quite an impressive list of non-issues to lead with. Take a closer look back through the posts - anything that is an exlcuded asset is something that does not transfer upon the sale. The US keeps all that stuff. Artifacts related to Ron will be a dfined term and will definitely include his body. I just didn't want to lawyer the term sheet all up. We'll get the LOI signed and then in the definitive purchase agreement hammer out those details. I think we have identified the most significant things in California and sought to exclude them. Now you can sit and quabble with your tired, predictable partisan rants, or you can help us identify other carveouts so we don't give away too much in connection with the sale. The support for the plan is overwhelming at this stage. As I said. Mexifornia claims no rights to any Regan assets. But they will commence the fucking of Reagan's skull. Perhaps for $50 or a red sweater as trade, you could get your turn. Dingleshit, We'll pull the excluded assets out of CA before the Closing, so how will they have physical possession of his skull? Yeah, it'll be a pain in the balls to move all the Reagan artifacts back to the Princeton/Dixon area just off the Reagan Memorial Highway, but we'll take care of it - then it will just be a short trek up I-39 for you to take the family up to the shrine - my plan has a little something for everyone. I don't want a real estate license for that stuff, I want it fully excluded so we can take it out before we close, just like we'll move the other excluded stuff out before we close. I think it goes without saying, but the assets necessary to maintain the military bases that will be subject to the real estate licenses will also be excluded assets, but will be held on the bases. The Reagan artifacts are all excluded assets, have been since my first post. You have just demonstrated why every deal has a waiver of jury trial clause in it, though. jwiley - we'll have to move Pebble Beach, if it will help get you on board, we'll move it the Vegas area, and we'll divert every river that flows into Cali to run into a huge lake that will be formed near PB so it will retain some of its appeal to being on the water. We'll have so much water flowing to Vegas, the city will ask you to water your lawns every day even during the worst drought seasons.
|
|
|
Post by socal on Jun 4, 2008 9:54:44 GMT -6
As I said. Mexifornia claims no rights to any Regan assets. But they will commence the fucking of Reagan's skull. Perhaps for $50 or a red sweater as trade, you could get your turn. While I generally think your obsession with skull f***ing is about a 9.5 on the creepiness scale, you're misunderstanding the concept of property. The right to property entails not only the right to use an asset, but to stop others from using it. For example, I own a dog. Owning the dog allows me not only to walk the dog, but to prevent you from humping it after you run out of skulls to f***. Now, I know you don't believe in private property, but it's a concept that's germane to US and Mexican law and would govern the terms of our agreement. There is no issue. You bozos have the rights to Regan. Mexifornia will retain the rights to Reagan. Should the Mexifornian citizens choose to fuck the skull of Reagan, that is their right. Should you choose to fuck the skull of Regan, that is your right. However, if you say Mexifornians cannot fuck their rightful property - including Reagan's skull... you have no power to do so. Likewise, if Mexifornians say you cannot molest the skull of Regan, they cannot rightfully do so.
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jun 4, 2008 9:59:11 GMT -6
There is no issue. You bozos have the rights to Regan. Mexifornia will retain the rights to Reagan. Go to my first post, Bozo: Excluded Assets: the Pr0n industry; the Reagan Liberry and all artificacts related to Ron and Nancy
|
|
|
Post by socal on Jun 4, 2008 10:23:23 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jun 4, 2008 11:37:33 GMT -6
OMG, we have a spelling cop on the board now. That's just what we need. I better start running every post through the spell checker so when the intellectual bankruptcy of the left leaves them with nothing to argue about but spelling, all arguments will be off the table.
I do believe liberry is the proper spelling of the word, tool.
|
|
|
Post by jwiley10 on Jun 4, 2008 11:49:33 GMT -6
I'm in. Especially if we move Pebble to the Vegas area. Although it will be tough to replicate the beachfront holes on Lake Las Vegas or the Colorado River, but we'll figure it out.
Nevada, Arizona and Southern Utah all have strict watering guidelines that are adhered to stringently. My front yard, by law, cannot have one blade of grass, and I can water my plants four times a day for 4 minutes each. Even the casinos such as the Bellagio have their own water source for use in their hotel. The ass-clowns in California do not have such requirements and are alloted 65% of the water from the Colorado River. So while we go through drought restrictions, every db in Cali is washing their car in the front yard three times a week.
As long as we can retain Pebble and the Dodgers, I am good to go.
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Jun 4, 2008 12:24:06 GMT -6
I'm in. Especially if we move Pebble to the Vegas area. Although it will be tough to replicate the beachfront holes on Lake Las Vegas or the Colorado River, but we'll figure it out. Nevada, Arizona and Southern Utah all have strict watering guidelines that are adhered to stringently. My front yard, by law, cannot have one blade of grass, and I can water my plants four times a day for 4 minutes each. Even the casinos such as the Bellagio have their own water source for use in their hotel. The ass-clowns in California do not have such requirements and are alloted 65% of the water from the Colorado River. So while we go through drought restrictions, every db in Cali is washing their car in the front yard three times a week. As long as we can retain Pebble and the Dodgers, I am good to go. No freaking way, taht's a damn joke. I am convinced that Nevada is the bastard child of this country in the eyes of the federal government. Riparian rights are ass. Yucca Mountain. Whatever the hell is going on in the desert. The storage of Megatron. Big gov no gambling over telephones laws that restrict the business of LV's sports books. It must be rough down there.
|
|
|
Post by socal on Jun 4, 2008 12:32:58 GMT -6
OMG, we have a spelling cop on the board now. That's just what we need. I better start running every post through the spell checker so when the intellectual bankruptcy of the left leaves them with nothing to argue about but spelling, all arguments will be off the table. I do believe liberry is the proper spelling of the word, tool. You're the "Attorney", slick. You get what you ask for.
|
|
|
Post by mattahawk on Jun 4, 2008 13:16:44 GMT -6
If the sale proceeds there is no way shape or form we can include Tinseltown. All I need to see is more fucking movies about pancho villa or watch them make the Americans at the Alamo look like the bad guys. I won't stand for it. N F'in WAY!!!
We also need to get the Army Corps of Engineers on line and figure out a way to move 1,300 miles of prime beach real estate. They can't have the damn beaches either!!!
|
|
|
Post by Chuck Storm on Jun 4, 2008 13:22:56 GMT -6
If the sale proceeds there is no way shape or form we can include Tinseltown. All I need to see is more fucking movies about pancho villa or watch them make the Americans at the Alamo look like the bad guys. I won't stand for it. N F'in WAY!!! We also need to get the Army Corps of Engineers on line and figure out a way to move 1,300 miles of prime beach real estate. They can't have the damn beaches either!!! If that's the issue, perhaps it makes sense to consider a spinoff instead. We'll load California with the same debt and instead of making them part of Mexico, get the army corps of engineers to come in and split California off from the rest of the mainland. Make the channel between the new island of California and the mainland wide enough that a hippie can't swim across it and everybody wins. California and Nevada each get a thousand miles of new coast line and we don't have to look at an ugly wall. We'll have to run some feasibility studies, but if we can put a man on the moon, I'm sure we can make this important project happen.
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Jun 4, 2008 13:43:06 GMT -6
Sell Texas instead.
|
|