|
|
Post by iammrhawkeyes on Mar 20, 2009 20:10:56 GMT -6
...to (possibly) mandatorily volunteer as HR 1388 passes. Maybe the Rothschilds do exist. I guess these fucking clods forgot about the 13th amendment: Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime where of the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1388&version=rh&nid=t0:rh:2355b) Specific Topics- In carrying out its general purpose under subsection (a), the Commission shall address and analyze the following specific topics:
(5)The effect on the Nation, on those who serve, and on the families of those who serve, if all individuals in the United States were expected to perform national service or were required to perform a certain amount of national service.
(6) Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.
(7) The need for a public service academy, a 4-year institution that offers a federally funded undergraduate education with a focus on training future public sector leaders. |
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Mar 21, 2009 8:45:27 GMT -6
Well, I think anyone who can read the plain English of the Constitution can readily discern that there is no such thing as a "reasonable" mandatory service requirement.
I'm interested in the "liberals" position on this matter. What do you guys think about this?
I wonder if the moneyed interests that fund the leftist, anti-freedom think tanks have reached the conclusion that there is and will be an oversupply of labor as old people work and live longer, so they are trying to concoct a scheme to defer the entry of young people into the job market to alleviate social unrest when labor restrictions and economic conditions send unemployment amongst the young soaring over 25%.
|
|
|
|
Post by socal on Mar 21, 2009 9:23:49 GMT -6
...to (possibly) mandatorily volunteer as HR 1388 passes. Maybe the Rothschilds do exist. I guess these fucking clods forgot about the 13th amendment: Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime where of the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1388&version=rh&nid=t0:rh:2355b) Specific Topics- In carrying out its general purpose under subsection (a), the Commission shall address and analyze the following specific topics:
(5)The effect on the Nation, on those who serve, and on the families of those who serve, if all individuals in the United States were expected to perform national service or were required to perform a certain amount of national service.
(6) Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.
(7) The need for a public service academy, a 4-year institution that offers a federally funded undergraduate education with a focus on training future public sector leaders.Both of you guys are fucktards... Will the person be involuntarily bound to the servitude? Are they able to walk away & go home or go watch Fox News / surf Drudge? Yes. Will they be forced to go to a 4 year institution? No. If they decide to go to the school and then not pay it off via service, they should be billed the standard tuition rates. idiots. |
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Mar 21, 2009 9:54:07 GMT -6
Both of you guys are fucktards... Will the person be involuntarily bound to the servitude? Are they able to walk away & go home or go watch Fox News / surf Drudge? Yes. Will they be forced to go to a 4 year institution? No. If they decide to go to the school and then not pay it off via service, they should be billed the standard tuition rates. idiots. Wow, the only thing I know about the Bill is what is on the face of the Bill, yet somehow I am a fucktard because kids can still go watch Fox News. The intellectual superiority of the Left is very strong. Reread number 5 and number 6. Take a look at the Bill. The establishment of the institution is independent of number 5 and number 6. I don't care if the "liberals" want to fund a school. The government already funds the Naval Academy, West Point and the Air Force Academy, if they want to add one more school to that mix, it's really not that big of a deal. The issue is not the school, it is the creation of an expectation of national service and a mandatory service requirement for all young people. I see nothing on the face of the bill that indicates higher education is in any way linked to the mandatory service requirement. Do you? Oh well, it doesn't really matter to me. My kids will be dual citizens. While your kids are pushing a broom at the local high school to fulfill their "mandatory service requirement" my kids will be hanging in Roppongi banging Russian and Thai hoes and drinking booze or tripping on peyote if they so choose*. Freedom is terrible. * If I have a daughter, she will be at home practicing piano under the tutelage of her mother. |
|
|
|
Post by iammrhawkeyes on Mar 27, 2009 23:06:54 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by socal on Mar 28, 2009 16:04:15 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by HawksStock on Mar 28, 2009 16:19:09 GMT -6
...to (possibly) mandatorily volunteer as HR 1388 passes. Maybe the Rothschilds do exist. I guess these fucking clods forgot about the 13th amendment: Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime where of the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1388&version=rh&nid=t0:rh:2355b) Specific Topics- In carrying out its general purpose under subsection (a), the Commission shall address and analyze the following specific topics:
(5)The effect on the Nation, on those who serve, and on the families of those who serve, if all individuals in the United States were expected to perform national service or were required to perform a certain amount of national service.
(6) Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.
(7) The need for a public service academy, a 4-year institution that offers a federally funded undergraduate education with a focus on training future public sector leaders.Um they do exist, unfortunately you still are under the assumption that this nation is still constitutional republic. Look at the news one just sailed the world on pontoon's. Think historically, money controls everything. I truly wish we'd never abandoned the barter system. Their might be a ruling class (over which I would have no control), but their would be a merchant class as a Chem. E. that I would be very much a part of. but my ability, my intelligence, and my work has been devalued. My best friend did (probably) the same research you did. His conclusion... Own a gun, but never use it unless someone is trying take your constitutional rights. Teach your children the value of being a savant, and understand the constitution. And understand that our founding father secret society (free masons) was not yet integrated until long after the Illuminati had infiltrated them. Faith, man. Faith. |
|
|
|
Post by HawksStock on Mar 28, 2009 17:35:02 GMT -6
Well, I think anyone who can read the plain English of the Constitution can readily discern that there is no such thing as a "reasonable" mandatory service requirement. I'm interested in the "liberals" position on this matter. What do you guys think about this? I wonder if the moneyed interests that fund the leftist, anti-freedom think tanks have reached the conclusion that there is and will be an oversupply of labor as old people work and live longer, so they are trying to concoct a scheme to defer the entry of young people into the job market to alleviate social unrest when labor restrictions and economic conditions send unemployment amongst the young soaring over 25%. [/b] the same money that funds the left also funds the fund the right, they're not concerned about ideology... they're concerned about wealth, their own. |
|
|
|
Post by mattahawk on Mar 30, 2009 12:06:23 GMT -6
No doubt about that. There always have been, there always will be crooks on both sides. I find it hilarious when one party tries to upstage the other based on "morals."
|
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Mar 30, 2009 14:29:36 GMT -6
What's it matter? We are all a bunch of fucking corporate slaves anyway, whether you work for a corporation or not. Our government, and in fact all world governments, do the bidding of the global corporatariat, and we are their chattel.
If you don't believe me, go take a stroll down K Street, or hang out at the upcoming G20 and see who's getting stroked.
|
|
