|
|
Post by iammrhawkeyes on Apr 29, 2009 10:08:26 GMT -6
Who says the gang at CNN doesn't do hardhitting political analysis. The next Palin? Well, she's way better looking and is apparently a hell of alot smarter. The importent question that I wanted answered(Does she do anal?) wasn't asked by these idiots. www.cnn.com/video/#/video/showbiz/2009/04/28/sbt.new.palin.cnn |
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Apr 29, 2009 20:11:55 GMT -6
Who says the gang at CNN doesn't do hardhitting political analysis. The next Palin? Well, she's way better looking and is apparently a hell of alot smarter. The importent question that I wanted answered(Does she do anal?) wasn't asked by these idiots. www.cnn.com/video/#/video/showbiz/2009/04/28/sbt.new.palin.cnnAnother moderately attractive idiot? I thought you were gonna hit us with Michelle "Hoot Smalley" Bachmann (she HAS to be a Democratic plant). Actually, this Miss CA chick is an upgrade to Palin. Palin's got some serious white trash shit going on. |
|
|
|
Post by iammrhawkeyes on Apr 29, 2009 20:32:55 GMT -6
Miss CA has my wiener's vote all sewn up in 2012. It doesn't mind the plasticness. I actually think this is a shrewd move by the Obama water carriers. Get some mindless babe who spouts off a few right-wingisms and call her a legitimate threat to Palin's possible 2012 run. Marginalize, marginalize, marginalize. I wonder(and hope) if CNN will get a few playmates on to discuss their attributes and possible political aspirations. If nothing else, it could help improve CNN's dismal ratings. Carrie Creamjean in 2012. Yes we can!
|
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Apr 29, 2009 20:45:37 GMT -6
The whole controversy surrounding this chick is ridiculous. She gave an honest answer to a question. I guess she was supposed to read fake-celeb and savant of annoyance Perez Hilton's fragile little mind. Now of course the theocrats are using her mistreatment as evidence of overbearing systemic discrimination and screaming like the victims of the century.
For crissakes, it's a beauty pageant scuffle between a vapid bimbo and a flaming-gay quasi-celeb and nothing more.
Worthy of a chuckle, but not of analysis.
|
|
|
|
Post by iammrhawkeyes on Apr 29, 2009 21:00:38 GMT -6
I thought The Pageant rules stated that answers by the contestants were to be five words or less to avoid any US American debacles. "I want world peace", "Oh my Gawd", "What was the question again" and "I love puppies and kittens" are all appropriate and well thought out answers. Miss CA blew it(I wish).
|
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on Apr 30, 2009 10:18:57 GMT -6
I thought The Pageant rules stated that answers by the contestants were to be five words or less to avoid any US American debacles. "I want world peace", "Oh my Gawd", "What was the question again" and "I love puppies and kittens" are all appropriate and well thought out answers. Miss CA blew it(I wish). Frankly the fact that they are even allowed to speak is too much. |
|
