|
|
Post by Hawkeyes1982 on May 7, 2008 13:15:28 GMT -6
Ok, i've drank alot, I'll admit i've been busted and I blew a 0.158. I could not imagin being a 0.578, and it was a teenager a GIRL teenager. Lucky to be alive she is. www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354397,00.html |
|
|
|
Post by hawkeyescott on May 7, 2008 13:44:28 GMT -6
This is the best part of the story:
Investigators are still piecing together what happened that night and trying to determine if there was any criminal wrongdoing.
Well lets see: a 15 year old about drank herself to death, what more information do these fucking morons need to see if any criminal wrong doing happend?
1) If she bought it, then it was sold illegally
2) If she didn't buy it, then someone of age did and gave it to minors.
Yeah, I would need more info to see if a criminal activity happened. Sure they may need more to find the buyer or seller, but I think it is safe to say someone committed a crime.
|
|
|
|
Post by Saggitariutt Jefferspin (ith) on May 7, 2008 13:52:52 GMT -6
True, but it could be anything as simple as underage drinking (say she stole it from her parent's stash) to much more if she bought it, or someone else bought it for her.
|
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on May 7, 2008 14:16:21 GMT -6
Eff that, I call shenanigans. autolykos has an alcohawk and I blew a .34 at happy hour one day after a single belt of Scotch. The cops probably just did a breath test and she had probably just taken a drink or vomitted a bunch of booze back up and the reading was skewed by residual mouth alcohol. .578 is DOA range.
|
|
|
|
Post by socal on May 7, 2008 14:45:57 GMT -6
This is the best part of the story: No, this is the best part of the story: "http://www.foxnews.com" If it's Fox, it's got to be outrage - or a troubled/missing chick... |
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on May 8, 2008 11:09:02 GMT -6
That's got to be a skewed reading. She'd be dead if it were legit. It's virtually impossible to drink yourself that drunk unless alcohol is literally being jammed down your gullet while you're out cold.
|
|
|
|
Post by Saggitariutt Jefferspin (ith) on May 8, 2008 11:14:00 GMT -6
That's got to be a skewed reading. She'd be dead if it were legit. It's virtually impossible to drink yourself that drunk unless alcohol is literally being jammed down your gullet while you're out cold. Which is probably why this is newsworthy. I suppose if she just chugged a bottle of vodka (after already drinking), it could probably be possible. |
|
|
|
Post by socal on May 8, 2008 11:22:15 GMT -6
That's got to be a skewed reading. She'd be dead if it were legit. It's virtually impossible to drink yourself that drunk unless alcohol is literally being jammed down your gullet while you're out cold. I disagree somewhat... as a breathalyzer measures the alcohol content in exhaled breath... and everybody has a slightly different internal structure/variation on their metabolic systems, I see it as possible. While she may have been the person with the most able traits- in this situation- at the right time, there could be some person out there that could blow much higher (if they were ever asked/forced to do so- at the right time)... as their respiratory system & chemical makeup allows their lungs to expel a larger volume of gaseous alcohol. Take another human function... Peter North for example... while many people likely have the capabilities to "shoot a semi-auto rifle" as he does, he is mostly unique - as most others with this capability- aren't in his business/aren't public. |
|
|
|
Post by NotMyKid on May 8, 2008 14:44:08 GMT -6
That's got to be a skewed reading. She'd be dead if it were legit. It's virtually impossible to drink yourself that drunk unless alcohol is literally being jammed down your gullet while you're out cold. Take another human function... Peter North for example... while many people likely have the capabilities to "shoot a semi-auto rifle" as he does, he is mostly unique - as most others with this capability- aren't in his business/aren't public. Nice example Socal!  |
|
|
|
Post by socal on May 8, 2008 15:33:45 GMT -6
I'm glad somebody got it...
|
|
|
|
Post by Saggitariutt Jefferspin (ith) on May 8, 2008 15:46:46 GMT -6
"North Pole" fan?  |
|
|
|
Post by iammrhawkeyes on May 8, 2008 22:06:31 GMT -6
[quote author=socal board=talk thread=752 post=8792 time=1210267335
Take another human function... Peter North for example... while many people likely have the capabilities to "shoot a semi-auto rifle" as he does, he is mostly unique - as most others with this capability- aren't in his business/aren't public.
[/quote]
I disagree. That's a fully automatic rifle.
|
|
