|
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Sept 26, 2014 10:41:20 GMT -6
Yep, we are all afflicted with something. I like the Boys, but hate Romo and want him gone. Now! Why the hell would you hate Romo? He's good. When you look over his career numbers, he's on par with the upper level of QB's in the league. Just the rest of the team shits the bed.
|
|
|
Post by egadsto on Sept 26, 2014 10:47:29 GMT -6
Why the hell would you hate Romo? He's good. When you look over his career numbers, he's on par with the upper level of QB's in the league. Just the rest of the team shits the bed. Yeah, he usually picks the worst times to implode himself. I remember seeing a stat where is said he had the highest 4th quarter QB rating in the league over the past so many years. Do you know why that is? Because he sucks most of the 1st 3 quarters and needs to be the hero at the end. Look at last weeks' game against StL. Wow, was he horrible to start the game. And, last year's Denver game was the best example. Back and forth with Manning until the Cowboys get the ball needing to drive for the win. Romo throws into triple coverage and then looks to the sidelines like, what the heck? He's the worst.
|
|
|
Post by #70 on Sept 26, 2014 10:51:31 GMT -6
Yeah, Romo isn't the problem buddy. It's your anemic defense and horrible play calling. Hell, this year they finally realized that RUNNING THE BALL WORKS! NO WAY!
|
|
|
Post by egadsto on Sept 26, 2014 10:58:21 GMT -6
Yeah, Romo isn't the problem buddy. It's your anemic defense and horrible play calling. Hell, this year they finally realized that RUNNING THE BALL WORKS! NO WAY! Um, why are the running the ball more? Hmm, Romo sucks at decision making! Always has, always will. Remember when he threw 5 INTs against Buffalo and was praised when he took them on a long drive to win the game? I do. Oh, and the defense sucks too.
|
|
|
Post by #70 on Sept 26, 2014 11:08:56 GMT -6
Yeah, Romo isn't the problem buddy. It's your anemic defense and horrible play calling. Hell, this year they finally realized that RUNNING THE BALL WORKS! NO WAY! Um, why are the running the ball more? Hmm, Romo sucks at decision making! Always has, always will. Remember when he threw 5 INTs against Buffalo and was praised when he took them on a long drive to win the game? I do. Oh, and the defense sucks too. Do you know how bad your play calling has been in recent years? They totally abandoned the running game in the first quarter multiple, multiple times. Romo is not the problem. You keep saying all this crap about how bad he's been, and yet he's won half the games you are mentioning. Cuz, ya know, that's not the goal or anything.
|
|
|
Post by egadsto on Sept 26, 2014 13:01:07 GMT -6
Um, why are the running the ball more? Hmm, Romo sucks at decision making! Always has, always will. Remember when he threw 5 INTs against Buffalo and was praised when he took them on a long drive to win the game? I do. Oh, and the defense sucks too. Do you know how bad your play calling has been in recent years? They totally abandoned the running game in the first quarter multiple, multiple times. Romo is not the problem. You keep saying all this crap about how bad he's been, and yet he's won half the games you are mentioning. Cuz, ya know, that's not the goal or anything. So, because they beat Buffalo after throwing 5 INTs in the game shows he's good? Really? You can't be serious. Most of the time they are in a close game late is because of the defense and Romo's poor decision making. The play calling hasn't been great, but some of it falls on Romo's decisions during those plays.
|
|
|
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Sept 26, 2014 13:29:38 GMT -6
Don't worry Egads... Romo has been eaten. And replaced... By my babby.
|
|
|
Post by #70 on Sept 26, 2014 13:32:21 GMT -6
Do you know how bad your play calling has been in recent years? They totally abandoned the running game in the first quarter multiple, multiple times. Romo is not the problem. You keep saying all this crap about how bad he's been, and yet he's won half the games you are mentioning. Cuz, ya know, that's not the goal or anything. So, because they beat Buffalo after throwing 5 INTs in the game shows he's good? Really? You can't be serious. Most of the time they are in a close game late is because of the defense and Romo's poor decision making. The play calling hasn't been great, but some of it falls on Romo's decisions during those plays. www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/pass_rating_career.htm
|
|
|
Post by #70 on Sept 26, 2014 13:33:46 GMT -6
Manning looked like shit in the super bowl. They lost by 35. He must suck.
|
|
|
Post by egadsto on Sept 26, 2014 13:33:49 GMT -6
So, because they beat Buffalo after throwing 5 INTs in the game shows he's good? Really? You can't be serious. Most of the time they are in a close game late is because of the defense and Romo's poor decision making. The play calling hasn't been great, but some of it falls on Romo's decisions during those plays. www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/pass_rating_career.htmJoe Montana at #10 with Romo at #5 on that list. I will take that with a grain of salt, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Sept 26, 2014 13:33:51 GMT -6
Don't worry Egads... Romo has been eaten. And replaced... By my babby. Is he walking?
|
|
|
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Sept 26, 2014 13:34:33 GMT -6
Don't worry Egads... Romo has been eaten. And replaced... By my babby. Is he walking? Not quite yet, but he's getting closer to it.
|
|
|
Post by egadsto on Sept 26, 2014 13:35:30 GMT -6
Don't worry Egads... Romo has been eaten. And replaced... By my babby. Is he walking? Romo? Barely.
|
|
|
Post by #70 on Sept 26, 2014 13:35:44 GMT -6
Joe Montana at #10 with Romo at #5 on that list. I will take that with a grain of salt, thanks. That's interesting. Look at all the QBs on that list. The vast majority of them are good/great QBs. The fact that he's on that list disproves your point right there. And the fact that he is number 5 just blows it out of the water.
|
|
|
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Sept 26, 2014 13:37:39 GMT -6
niiiiice paneling there, R2. Is that a real wood veneer? Ur livin LIKE A BOSS. Duff is mad jelly. Rightfully he should be jelly. It's real authentic 1960's paneling.
|
|
|
Post by #70 on Sept 26, 2014 13:38:53 GMT -6
Don't worry Egads... Romo has been eaten. And replaced... By my babby. we will just focus on out-running him! (excuse the ghetto rig on the front to weigh it down)
|
|
|
Post by egadsto on Sept 26, 2014 13:39:11 GMT -6
Joe Montana at #10 with Romo at #5 on that list. I will take that with a grain of salt, thanks. That's interesting. Look at all the QBs on that list. The vast majority of them are good/great QBs. The fact that he's on that list disproves your point right there. And the fact that he is number 5 just blows it out of the water. Actually, it proves my point. If he really is the #5 QB, you would think you would make more clutch plays when the game is on the line. The defense sucks (and they were the worst in the league last year) but that has not always been the case. If you can't see that Romo is the Jerry Jones "I am always right" all time greatest hoax, I can't help you. There is a reason he wasn't drafted and there's a reason the Cowboys will never be a serious contending team while he is the starting QB. By the way, Matt Ryan is #11, Chad Pennington is #12, and Jeff Garcia is #15. Need I say more?
|
|
|
Post by #70 on Sept 26, 2014 13:41:22 GMT -6
That's interesting. Look at all the QBs on that list. The vast majority of them are good/great QBs. The fact that he's on that list disproves your point right there. And the fact that he is number 5 just blows it out of the water. Actually, it proves my point. If he really is the #5 QB, you would think you would make more clutch plays when the game is on the line. The defense sucks (and they were the worst in the league last year) but that has not always been the case. If you can't see that Romo is the Jerry Jones "I am always right" all time greatest hoax, I can't help you. There is a reason he wasn't drafted and there's a reason the Cowboys will never be a serious contending team while he is the starting QB. By the way, Matt Ryan is #11, Chad Pennington is #12, and Jeff Garcia is #15. Need I say more? Jeff Garcia was a damn good QB, even with the fact that he played at the VERY end of his prime. Pennington is the outlier, of course, and Matt Ryan? Look at the numbers he's put up. Jesus.
|
|
|
Post by egadsto on Sept 26, 2014 13:45:29 GMT -6
Actually, it proves my point. If he really is the #5 QB, you would think you would make more clutch plays when the game is on the line. The defense sucks (and they were the worst in the league last year) but that has not always been the case. If you can't see that Romo is the Jerry Jones "I am always right" all time greatest hoax, I can't help you. There is a reason he wasn't drafted and there's a reason the Cowboys will never be a serious contending team while he is the starting QB. By the way, Matt Ryan is #11, Chad Pennington is #12, and Jeff Garcia is #15. Need I say more? Jeff Garcia was a damn good QB, even with the fact that he played at the VERY end of his prime. Pennington is the outlier, of course, and Matt Ryan? Look at the numbers he's put up. Jesus. Really. Those 3 QBs are rated ahead of Marino, Graham, Favre (insert own joke here), Kelly, Staubach, etc. I could go on. If you can't figure out that today's rules that tilt the field towards the offense have skewed how the QB rating works, then I am not sure what to say. Phillip Rivers is #4 all time? I am not going to go with that. Oh, and Matt Schaub is #13 for pete's sake.
|
|
|
Post by #70 on Sept 26, 2014 13:49:41 GMT -6
Jeff Garcia was a damn good QB, even with the fact that he played at the VERY end of his prime. Pennington is the outlier, of course, and Matt Ryan? Look at the numbers he's put up. Jesus. Really. Those 3 QBs are rated ahead of Marino, Graham, Favre (insert own joke here), Kelly, Staubach, etc. I could go on. If you can't figure out that today's rules that tilt the field towards the offense have skewed how the QB rating works, then I am not sure what to say. Phillip Rivers is #4 all time? I am not going to go with that. Oh, and Matt Schaub is #13 for pete's sake. I never once said the list is perfect. QB rating doesnt tell the whole picture. Never will. Matt Schaub WAS good for quite some time, until he hit a wall and never woke up. If you tell me Phillip Rivers doesn't deserve to be on that list, you are crazy. That guy can flat out play that position. Just because Staubach is behind Rivers doesn't mean I take Rivers every time, because I know things have changed. The fact that they are on that list is telling. But the list, as a whole, has a ton of good QBs on it. And Romo is one. The one thing I will say about it is it doesn't take into account length of career all that much. But for you to hate Romo, I could name only about 6-7 QBs in this league that I'd take over him, and most (if not all) are on that same list.
|
|
|
Post by egadsto on Sept 26, 2014 13:58:20 GMT -6
Really. Those 3 QBs are rated ahead of Marino, Graham, Favre (insert own joke here), Kelly, Staubach, etc. I could go on. If you can't figure out that today's rules that tilt the field towards the offense have skewed how the QB rating works, then I am not sure what to say. Phillip Rivers is #4 all time? I am not going to go with that. Oh, and Matt Schaub is #13 for pete's sake. I never once said the list is perfect. QB rating doesnt tell the whole picture. Never will. Matt Schaub WAS good for quite some time, until he hit a wall and never woke up. If you tell me Phillip Rivers doesn't deserve to be on that list, you are crazy. That guy can flat out play that position. Just because Staubach is behind Rivers doesn't mean I take Rivers every time, because I know things have changed. The fact that they are on that list is telling. But the list, as a whole, has a ton of good QBs on it. And Romo is one. The one thing I will say about it is it doesn't take into account length of career all that much. But for you to hate Romo, I could name only about 6-7 QBs in this league that I'd take over him, and most (if not all) are on that same list. I would take many more QBs in the league over Romo than 6 or 7. Eli Manning at #45 for example. Much better leader, much better player when it matters. Proven over the years. Funnier too. My point is, the list you referenced is a flawed list over an over dramatized rating that is out of date.
|
|
|
Post by Aborted Cyclone Fetus on Sept 26, 2014 13:58:37 GMT -6
niiiiice paneling there, R2. Is that a real wood veneer? Ur livin LIKE A BOSS. Duff is mad jelly. What's wrong with would paneling brah?
|
|
|
Post by #70 on Sept 26, 2014 13:59:54 GMT -6
I never once said the list is perfect. QB rating doesnt tell the whole picture. Never will. Matt Schaub WAS good for quite some time, until he hit a wall and never woke up. If you tell me Phillip Rivers doesn't deserve to be on that list, you are crazy. That guy can flat out play that position. Just because Staubach is behind Rivers doesn't mean I take Rivers every time, because I know things have changed. The fact that they are on that list is telling. But the list, as a whole, has a ton of good QBs on it. And Romo is one. The one thing I will say about it is it doesn't take into account length of career all that much. But for you to hate Romo, I could name only about 6-7 QBs in this league that I'd take over him, and most (if not all) are on that same list. I would take many more QBs in the league over Romo than 6 or 7. Eli Manning at #45 for example. Much better leader, much better player when it matters. Proven over the years. Funnier too. My point is, the list you referenced is a flawed list over an over dramatized rating that is out of date. Name the QBs you would take over Romo. I'll awaiting the giggles.
|
|
|
Post by Ginger on Sept 26, 2014 14:06:02 GMT -6
niiiiice paneling there, R2. Is that a real wood veneer? Ur livin LIKE A BOSS. Duff is mad jelly. What's wrong with would paneling brah? Nothing if you're a prole... Back to srs sprots talk.
|
|
|
Post by egadsto on Sept 26, 2014 14:07:48 GMT -6
I would take many more QBs in the league over Romo than 6 or 7. Eli Manning at #45 for example. Much better leader, much better player when it matters. Proven over the years. Funnier too. My point is, the list you referenced is a flawed list over an over dramatized rating that is out of date. Name the QBs you would take over Romo. I'll awaiting the giggles. Rodgers, Manning, Manning, Newton, Brees, Luck, Kaepernick, Wilson, Brady, Big Ben, Rivers, Ryan, and Flacco. That's 13. I am not even including Stafford and Dalton (younger versions of Romo). And don't get me started on Cutler (although he may be Romo's evil twin).
|
|