|
Stonks
Jan 29, 2021 11:49:59 GMT -6
Post by thunderhawk on Jan 29, 2021 11:49:59 GMT -6
This is probably pretty accurate tbh. But it's really not entirely fair to blame the guys for all of this. Men in this society are held to almost impossible and increasingly narrow standards and definitions of desirability and success. It's the same shit women have been dealing with, with an infusion of testosterone and aggression and inability of males to address their insecurities. Women aren't held to impossible standards because testosterone will cause a gal who is a 4 turn into a 9.5 at 1:40 in the morning in an Iowa City bar. The inverse is not true. A woman has intrinsic value that most men never will. Until she hits The Wall anyway. The problem the guys have is hypergamy. The rape factories masquerading as colleges are skewing close to 60/40 female and the gals don't want to marry down. "Oh you didn't go to college and run a business with a crew of 20 guys who hang drywall? NEXT." The educated female to educated male imbalance in places like NYC and Chicago has created a monster. There's an inverse of that monster in Seattle and Silicon Valley. True, but every woman I've ever been involved with has spent thousands upon thousands per annum on her appearance beyond the usual costs for clothes and gym memberships. Which is ostensibly to render themselves more attractive so they can be all woke and pissed off when complemented on their looks.
|
|
|
Stonks
Jan 29, 2021 12:42:32 GMT -6
Post by NOTTHOR on Jan 29, 2021 12:42:32 GMT -6
Women aren't held to impossible standards because testosterone will cause a gal who is a 4 turn into a 9.5 at 1:40 in the morning in an Iowa City bar. The inverse is not true. A woman has intrinsic value that most men never will. Until she hits The Wall anyway. The problem the guys have is hypergamy. The rape factories masquerading as colleges are skewing close to 60/40 female and the gals don't want to marry down. "Oh you didn't go to college and run a business with a crew of 20 guys who hang drywall? NEXT." The educated female to educated male imbalance in places like NYC and Chicago has created a monster. There's an inverse of that monster in Seattle and Silicon Valley. True, but every woman I've ever been involved with has spent thousands upon thousands per annum on her appearance beyond the usual costs for clothes and gym memberships. Which is ostensibly to render themselves more attractive so they can be all woke and pissed off when complemented on their looks. That, xir, is more of an indictment on your taste than women in general. There's a reason the vast majority of ad spend is burned on women as a group and males under 25.
|
|
|
Stonks
Jan 29, 2021 12:45:04 GMT -6
Post by LansingHawk on Jan 29, 2021 12:45:04 GMT -6
This is probably pretty accurate tbh. But it's really not entirely fair to blame the guys for all of this. Men in this society are held to almost impossible and increasingly narrow standards and definitions of desirability and success. It's the same shit women have been dealing with, with an infusion of testosterone and aggression and inability of males to address their insecurities. Women aren't held to impossible standards because testosterone will cause a gal who is a 4 turn into a 9.5 at 1:40 in the morning in an Iowa City bar. The inverse is not true. A woman has intrinsic value that most men never will. Until she hits The Wall anyway. The problem the guys have is hypergamy. The rape factories masquerading as colleges are skewing close to 60/40 female and the gals don't want to marry down. "Oh you didn't go to college and run a business with a crew of 20 guys who hang drywall? NEXT." The educated female to educated male imbalance in places like NYC and Chicago has created a monster. There's an inverse of that monster in Seattle and Silicon Valley. Problem with guys running drywall crews?
|
|
|
Stonks
Jan 29, 2021 13:24:49 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by TaterWanger on Jan 29, 2021 13:24:49 GMT -6
My biggest problem in college was so many holes so little time.
|
|
|
Stonks
Jan 29, 2021 14:25:46 GMT -6
Post by GhostMod 5000 on Jan 29, 2021 14:25:46 GMT -6
My biggest problem in college was so many holes so little time. I'm sure you got plenty of Fs in college
|
|
|
Stonks
Jan 29, 2021 14:47:25 GMT -6
Post by TaterWanger on Jan 29, 2021 14:47:25 GMT -6
My biggest problem in college was so many holes so little time. I'm sure you got plenty of Fs in college Did u cash in your life savings and buy one share of GME?
|
|
|
Stonks
Jan 29, 2021 15:10:24 GMT -6
Post by NOTTHOR on Jan 29, 2021 15:10:24 GMT -6
It looks like with this closing price the risk to the whole market should be averted. Had this thing gapped to over $1000 there would have been huge trouble.
I cleared just a hair over 300% on AMC and am now out.
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 1, 2021 11:44:56 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Feb 1, 2021 11:44:56 GMT -6
Diamonds hands on this bitch. Bought in a couple weeks ago and have so far 242 stocks of GME. Waiting for the next dip to buy a couple more.
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 1, 2021 12:08:03 GMT -6
Post by NOTTHOR on Feb 1, 2021 12:08:03 GMT -6
Diamonds hands on this bitch. Bought in a couple weeks ago and have so far 242 stocks of GME. Waiting for the next dip to buy a couple more. Post your loss porn when you diamond hand this bitch into the side of a mountain like Kobe's helicopter pilot. Their fiscal year ends today. I'll be shocked if they don't do a secondary offering on this to improve their financial position. The only thing holding that back is the disclosure requirements under the Securities Act - they have to get the earnings announced. I guaranfuckingtee you that a team of crank bitches is putting together an 8-K to pre-announce earnings so they can skullfuck everyone who is buying this stock at these levels. The only question at this point is can the market stay retarded high long enough for them to flood the market with a bunch of new shares?
|
|
|
Post by TaterWanger on Feb 1, 2021 13:09:51 GMT -6
Diamonds hands on this bitch. Bought in a couple weeks ago and have so far 242 stocks of GME. Waiting for the next dip to buy a couple more. Post your loss porn when you diamond hand this bitch into the side of a mountain like Kobe's helicopter pilot. Their fiscal year ends today. I'll be shocked if they don't do a secondary offering on this to improve their financial position. The only thing holding that back is the disclosure requirements under the Securities Act - they have to get the earnings announced. I guaranfuckingtee you that a team of crank bitches is putting together an 8-K to pre-announce earnings so they can skullfuck everyone who is buying this stock at these levels. The only question at this point is can the market stay retarded high long enough for them to flood the market with a bunch of new shares? 24 bonus points for working in the Kobe analogy.
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 1, 2021 13:19:39 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Feb 1, 2021 13:19:39 GMT -6
Diamonds hands on this bitch. Bought in a couple weeks ago and have so far 242 stocks of GME. Waiting for the next dip to buy a couple more. Post your loss porn when you diamond hand this bitch into the side of a mountain like Kobe's helicopter pilot. Their fiscal year ends today. I'll be shocked if they don't do a secondary offering on this to improve their financial position. The only thing holding that back is the disclosure requirements under the Securities Act - they have to get the earnings announced. I guaranfuckingtee you that a team of crank bitches is putting together an 8-K to pre-announce earnings so they can skullfuck everyone who is buying this stock at these levels. The only question at this point is can the market stay retarded high long enough for them to flood the market with a bunch of new shares? I hedged my bets a little and sold a few to cover my initial investment. I'll be fine.
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 1, 2021 19:56:15 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Feb 1, 2021 19:56:15 GMT -6
Btw, I like the Stock. Who else is with me?
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 1, 2021 20:46:29 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by TaterWanger on Feb 1, 2021 20:46:29 GMT -6
Btw, I like the Stock. Who else is with me? WE LIKE TEH STONK!!!!
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 2, 2021 7:57:50 GMT -6
Post by NOTTHOR on Feb 2, 2021 7:57:50 GMT -6
Btw, I like the Stock. Who else is with me? The stock is a turd and the only rational trade is the short position right now.
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 2, 2021 7:59:47 GMT -6
Post by NOTTHOR on Feb 2, 2021 7:59:47 GMT -6
Holy balls, down 128 in premarket. The loss porn on WSB is going to be amazing.
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 2, 2021 10:25:34 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Feb 2, 2021 10:25:34 GMT -6
Holy balls, down 128 in premarket. The loss porn on WSB is going to be amazing. Just bought another 40 shares at 82. I still like the Stock and will help take it to the moon.
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 2, 2021 10:42:27 GMT -6
Post by NOTTHOR on Feb 2, 2021 10:42:27 GMT -6
Holy balls, down 128 in premarket. The loss porn on WSB is going to be amazing. Just bought another 40 shares at 82. I still like the Stock and will help take it to the moon. If you want to swing trade it, fine, but again, for the love of God, they are in a lockup period where the employees and company can't sell because they don't have earnings out yet. A diamond hand trade on this is going to be the most colossal house of pain ever.
|
|
|
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Feb 2, 2021 10:49:30 GMT -6
Just bought another 40 shares at 82. I still like the Stock and will help take it to the moon. If you want to swing trade it, fine, but again, for the love of God, they are in a lockup period where the employees and company can't sell because they don't have earnings out yet. A diamond hand trade on this is going to be the most colossal house of pain ever. Once the squeeze happens then I'll sell. Shooting for 694.20 price to sell at.
|
|
|
Post by TaterWanger on Feb 2, 2021 10:56:10 GMT -6
Just bought another 40 shares at 82. I still like the Stock and will help take it to the moon. If you want to swing trade it, fine, but again, for the love of God, they are in a lockup period where the employees and company can't sell because they don't have earnings out yet. A diamond hand trade on this is going to be the most colossal house of pain ever. I liked it at 445, and I liked it eve moar now. I just liquidated my 401k and leveraged it as much as possible. You said this fing is gunna hit 1,000. Im goin to the moon baby!!!!
|
|
|
Post by NOTTHOR on Feb 2, 2021 11:00:47 GMT -6
If you want to swing trade it, fine, but again, for the love of God, they are in a lockup period where the employees and company can't sell because they don't have earnings out yet. A diamond hand trade on this is going to be the most colossal house of pain ever. Once the squeeze happens then I'll sell. Shooting for 694.20 price to sell at. The squeeze already fucking happened. And if it didn't it ain't gonna happen because GME is probably days away from pre-announcing earnings and being able to open the trading window again. Everyone there who has gotten a stock grant and is sitting on options or shares at sub $20 is going to flood the market sofaking hard with shares it ain't even funny. Imagine some schlub who's been there for 10 years and got 100 or 200 shares a year through the plan and now has 1000 shares. That poor bastard watched his position moon to half a million bucks and couldn't sell. The flood of shares that will hit the market is going to make that tsunami that hit Bali look like the fucking wave pool at Oceans of Fun. These media asshats are so busy defending the market manipulation that they aren't even explaining the substantial downside risk from massive potential share issuances or closure of blackout periods.
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 2, 2021 11:33:10 GMT -6
Post by socal on Feb 2, 2021 11:33:10 GMT -6
Once the squeeze happens then I'll sell. Shooting for 694.20 price to sell at. The squeeze already fucking happened. And if it didn't it ain't gonna happen because GME is probably days away from pre-announcing earnings and being able to open the trading window again. Everyone there who has gotten a stock grant and is sitting on options or shares at sub $20 is going to flood the market sofaking hard with shares it ain't even funny. Imagine some schlub who's been there for 10 years and got 100 or 200 shares a year through the plan and now has 1000 shares. That poor bastard watched his position moon to half a million bucks and couldn't sell. The flood of shares that will hit the market is going to make that tsunami that hit Bali look like the fucking wave pool at Oceans of Fun. These media asshats are so busy defending the market manipulation that they aren't even explaining the substantial downside risk from massive potential share issuances or closure of blackout periods. They'll be bailed out.
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 2, 2021 15:48:20 GMT -6
via mobile
Other likes this
Post by Ginger on Feb 2, 2021 15:48:20 GMT -6
Women aren't held to impossible standards because testosterone will cause a gal who is a 4 turn into a 9.5 at 1:40 in the morning in an Iowa City bar. The inverse is not true. A woman has intrinsic value that most men never will. Until she hits The Wall anyway. The problem the guys have is hypergamy. The rape factories masquerading as colleges are skewing close to 60/40 female and the gals don't want to marry down. "Oh you didn't go to college and run a business with a crew of 20 guys who hang drywall? NEXT." The educated female to educated male imbalance in places like NYC and Chicago has created a monster. There's an inverse of that monster in Seattle and Silicon Valley. True, but every woman I've ever been involved with has spent thousands upon thousands per annum on her appearance beyond the usual costs for clothes and gym memberships. Which is ostensibly to render themselves more attractive so they can be all woke and pissed off when complemented on their looks. So in general you like narcissistic women to go with your own narcissistic tendencies?
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 4, 2021 0:16:55 GMT -6
Post by thunderhawk on Feb 4, 2021 0:16:55 GMT -6
True, but every woman I've ever been involved with has spent thousands upon thousands per annum on her appearance beyond the usual costs for clothes and gym memberships. Which is ostensibly to render themselves more attractive so they can be all woke and pissed off when complemented on their looks. So in general you like narcissistic women to go with your own narcissistic tendencies? Apparently. And I'm paying for it.
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 4, 2021 0:36:28 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Ginger on Feb 4, 2021 0:36:28 GMT -6
So in general you like narcissistic women to go with your own narcissistic tendencies? Apparently. And I'm paying for it. I bet you are. Hell hath no fury...
|
|
|
Stonks
Feb 4, 2021 14:33:51 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Presidential Immunity Cock on Feb 4, 2021 14:33:51 GMT -6
Bailed at 98 a stonk yesterday. Cleared a nice amount of cash on that. Dropped 10k on Doge coin yesterday afternoon. Rest is sitting liquid in my account as I figure out what looks nice next.
|
|